ReSharper Support | JetBrains

Richard Deeming

Total activity 632
Last activity February 27, 2026 10:36
Member since October 06, 2010 20:13
Following 0 users
Followed by 0 users
Votes 47
Subscriptions 216

Created October 29, 2015 17:30

I wasn't dismissing the OP's requirement - I was just pointing out that you can use a lot of C#6 features if you're using VS2015, even if you're targeting earlier framework versions.And I'm not a m...
- 0 votes
Created November 06, 2015 11:55

Did you even read Jeffrey's answer?It's not a warning; it's not telling you to "fix" it; it's just offering you the option to refactor your code.If you use the context action to split the declarati...
- 0 votes
Created November 06, 2015 16:04

What "green checkbox"? That doesn't sound like a R# feature.
- 0 votes
Created November 06, 2015 16:11

Becase this is NOT an inspection!The option you are describing is a context action. It is an option to refactor your code. It is NOT a warning or an error. It will NOT appear in the R# marker bar.I...
- 0 votes
Created October 29, 2015 13:07

You need to add the ContractAnnotationAttribute to your method: [ContractAnnotation("source:null => true")]public static bool IsNullOrWhitespace(this string source){ return string.IsNullOrWhiteS...
- 0 votes
Created May 09, 2016 11:10

The parameter names for P/Invoke methods don't matter. All that matters is how the parameter values are laid out in memory when they're passed to the external method. You could call the parameter "...
- 0 votes
Created April 11, 2016 10:56

Try making the field volatile, as the Code Inspection Wiki suggests: https://confluence.jetbrains.com/display/ReSharper/Possible+multiple+write+access+in+double-checked+locking
- 0 votes
Created May 24, 2016 10:51

Thanks. The issue says "Fix version: 2016.1" - I assume that's a typo?
- 0 votes
Created May 23, 2016 11:07

Auto-properties don't have null checks. Changing your property to an auto-property would change the meaning of the code.
- 0 votes
Created October 18, 2011 12:55

Personally, I don't think this feature is even remotely related to what R# is designed for. I'd prefer the JetBrains team to concentrate on making R# work well at what it's designed for than have t...
- -3 votes