Stack trace explorer problem

Could you please save the stacktrace into a text file and send it as an attachment?

--
Valentin Kipiatkov
Chief Scientist, Vice President of Product Development
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com "Develop with pleasure!"

When I copy a stacktrace obtained via a "watch variable", the
stacktrace=
=
will contain "\r\n" sequences instead of the "real" newline codes.
When =
=
copied to the Stack trace explorer, it will not hyperlink the code =

locations.

The following stacktrace will not create a hyperlink to mainclass.cs

at =

System.Windows.Forms.ComponentManager.System.Windows.Forms.UnsafeNativ
eM= ethods+IMsoComponentManager.FPushMessageLoop(Int32 =

dwComponentID, Int32 reason, Int32 pvLoopData)\r\n at =

System.Windows.Forms.ThreadContext.RunMessageLoopInner(Int32 reason,
=

ApplicationContext context)\r\n at =

System.Windows.Forms.ThreadContext.RunMessageLoop(Int32 reason, =

ApplicationContext context)\r\n at =

System.Windows.Forms.Application.Run(ApplicationContext context)\r\n
a= t =

Zwitserleven.MainClass.Main() in d:
cvs_work
zwitserleven conversie
=

tool
program
sources
mainclass.cs:line 21"

When all "\r\n" character are replaced with newline code, it will
work. =
=
Can resharper take care of this automatically?

Arnold Nelisse

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 09:49:23 +0000 (UTC), Valentin Kipiatkov
<valentin@intellij.com> wrote:

Could you please save the stacktrace into a text file and send it as an
attachment?

>

Here it is.

Arnold

I see that now. In fact I think it's rather a request to the debugger. IMO it should have something like "Copy Value" action which copies the string value into clipboard. Fixing that in Stack Trace Explorer would look like a patch...

--
Valentin Kipiatkov
Chief Scientist, Vice President of Product Development
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com "Develop with pleasure!"

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 09:49:23 +0000 (UTC), Valentin Kipiatkov

<valentin@intellij.com> wrote:

>> Could you please save the stacktrace into a text file and send it as
>> a
>>

n

>> attachment?
>>

Here it is.

Arnold