Two things I miss most from IDEA when using Resharper

There are, among the hundreds of features of IDEA, two that I specifically
miss when using Reshaper:

1) Smart-Enter... where it completes the line (no matter where you press it)
and moves the cursor to the correct place on a new line, as required,
inserting semicolons, etc. Smart enough that you can bind it to the
key and it just does the right thing.

2) Go To Symbol... where you can just type in the name of a method name,
field name, etc, and go directly to its declaration just like 'Go To Class'

Is there any chance of having these added to a 1.x update? Please?


14 comments
Comment actions Permalink

Is there any chance of having these added to a 1.x update? Please?


The next planned release is 2.0. 1.0.x releases are just bugfixes and have no new features.
The number 2 in your list will be implemented in 2.0. No guarantee about the number 1.

Valentin Kipiatkov
Chief Scientist, Vice President of Product Development
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

There are, among the hundreds of features of IDEA, two that I
specifically miss when using Reshaper:

1) Smart-Enter... where it completes the line (no matter where you
press it) and moves the cursor to the correct place on a new line, as
required, inserting semicolons, etc. Smart enough that you can bind
it to the key and it just does the right thing.

2) Go To Symbol... where you can just type in the name of a method
name, field name, etc, and go directly to its declaration just like
'Go To Class'

Is there any chance of having these added to a 1.x update? Please?


0
Comment actions Permalink

When is the expected 2.0 version release?
Thanks,
Derek Price

"Valentin Kipiatkov (JetBrains)" <valentin@jetbrains.com> wrote in message
news:cko7vb$kr9$1@is.intellij.net...

Is there any chance of having these added to a 1.x update? Please?

>

The next planned release is 2.0. 1.0.x releases are just bugfixes and have

no new features.

The number 2 in your list will be implemented in 2.0. No guarantee about

the number 1.
>

Valentin Kipiatkov
Chief Scientist, Vice President of Product Development
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"



0
Comment actions Permalink

Okay.

Consider this a strong request for 'smart-enter' ... it's such a great and
fundamental feature.


"Valentin Kipiatkov (JetBrains)" <valentin@jetbrains.com> wrote in message
news:cko7vb$kr9$1@is.intellij.net...

Is there any chance of having these added to a 1.x update? Please?

>

The next planned release is 2.0. 1.0.x releases are just bugfixes and have

no new features.

The number 2 in your list will be implemented in 2.0. No guarantee about

the number 1.
>

Valentin Kipiatkov
Chief Scientist, Vice President of Product Development
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

>

There are, among the hundreds of features of IDEA, two that I
specifically miss when using Reshaper:

>

1) Smart-Enter... where it completes the line (no matter where you
press it) and moves the cursor to the correct place on a new line, as
required, inserting semicolons, etc. Smart enough that you can bind
it to the key and it just does the right thing.

>

2) Go To Symbol... where you can just type in the name of a method
name, field name, etc, and go directly to its declaration just like
'Go To Class'

>

Is there any chance of having these added to a 1.x update? Please?

>

>


0
Comment actions Permalink

When is the expected 2.0 version release?


About the same time when VS 2005 release.

Valentin Kipiatkov
Chief Scientist, Vice President of Product Development
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

When is the expected 2.0 version release?
Thanks,
Derek Price
"Valentin Kipiatkov (JetBrains)" <valentin@jetbrains.com> wrote in
message news:cko7vb$kr9$1@is.intellij.net...

>>> Is there any chance of having these added to a 1.x update? Please?
>>>
>> The next planned release is 2.0. 1.0.x releases are just bugfixes and
>> have
>>

no new features.

>> The number 2 in your list will be implemented in 2.0. No guarantee
>> about
>>

the number 1.

>> Valentin Kipiatkov
>> Chief Scientist, Vice President of Product Development
>> JetBrains, Inc
>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>> "Develop with pleasure!"

0
Comment actions Permalink

And when is the EAP for version 2.0 expected?

0
Comment actions Permalink

Probably not too far before the release because we are developing .NET IDE at the same time and plan to have EAP for it before EAP for VS 2005 add-in.
BTW, we are also developing a .NET profiling tool and wish to open EAP for it soon. Is anyone here interesting in such tool?

Valentin Kipiatkov
Chief Scientist, Vice President of Product Development
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

And when is the EAP for version 2.0 expected?


0
Comment actions Permalink

I am very interested! I hope you keep it simple like Red Gate's ANTS
profiler and not overwhelming like Compuware's.
Thanks,
Derek Price

"Valentin Kipiatkov (JetBrains)" <valentin@jetbrains.com> wrote in message
news:cl2u2j$laq$1@is.intellij.net...

Probably not too far before the release because we are developing .NET IDE

at the same time and plan to have EAP for it before EAP for VS 2005 add-in.

BTW, we are also developing a .NET profiling tool and wish to open EAP for

it soon. Is anyone here interesting in such tool?
>

Valentin Kipiatkov
Chief Scientist, Vice President of Product Development
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

>

And when is the EAP for version 2.0 expected?

>

>


0
Comment actions Permalink

I am very interested! I hope you keep it simple like Red Gate's ANTS
profiler and not overwhelming like Compuware's.


We try to make UI simple, intuitive and yet very powerful. :)
BTW we also tried ANTS profiler but the main concern with it was speed reduction of the program being profiled. In our tests (which are quite CPU intensive and do not much IO interactions), speed reduction was about 100 times. That was unacceptable because we often had to leave the profiled program running over night to get it complete! With our current profiler speed reduction on the same tests is 4-5 times or even less.
Did you experience the same problems?

Valentin Kipiatkov
Chief Scientist, Vice President of Product Development
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

I am very interested! I hope you keep it simple like Red Gate's ANTS
profiler and not overwhelming like Compuware's.
Thanks,
Derek Price
"Valentin Kipiatkov (JetBrains)" <valentin@jetbrains.com> wrote in
message news:cl2u2j$laq$1@is.intellij.net...

>> Probably not too far before the release because we are developing
>> .NET IDE
>>

at the same time and plan to have EAP for it before EAP for VS 2005
add-in.

>> BTW, we are also developing a .NET profiling tool and wish to open
>> EAP for
>>

it soon. Is anyone here interesting in such tool?

>> Valentin Kipiatkov
>> Chief Scientist, Vice President of Product Development
>> JetBrains, Inc
>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>> "Develop with pleasure!"
>>> And when is the EAP for version 2.0 expected?
>>>

0
Comment actions Permalink

BTW, we are also developing a .NET profiling tool and wish to open EAP
for it soon. Is anyone here interesting in such tool?

+1

Greetings.

0
Comment actions Permalink

I actually had very good luck, but my profiling was centered around a very
specific area. I was able to see quickly where the problem was. I never
had to grab a manual to figure out how to use the application. The opposite
was true for Compuware's. I'm not the brightest bulb in the Christmas tree,
but I'm not too dim and Compuware just seem too confusing. Granted it is
very powerful.

Where do I sign up for the EAP?

Thanks,
Derek

"Valentin Kipiatkov (JetBrains)" <valentin@jetbrains.com> wrote in message
news:cl3116$di9$1@is.intellij.net...

I am very interested! I hope you keep it simple like Red Gate's ANTS
profiler and not overwhelming like Compuware's.

>

We try to make UI simple, intuitive and yet very powerful. :)
BTW we also tried ANTS profiler but the main concern with it was speed

reduction of the program being profiled. In our tests (which are quite CPU
intensive and do not much IO interactions), speed reduction was about 100
times. That was unacceptable because we often had to leave the profiled
program running over night to get it complete! With our current profiler
speed reduction on the same tests is 4-5 times or even less.

Did you experience the same problems?

>

Valentin Kipiatkov
Chief Scientist, Vice President of Product Development
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

>

I am very interested! I hope you keep it simple like Red Gate's ANTS
profiler and not overwhelming like Compuware's.
Thanks,
Derek Price
"Valentin Kipiatkov (JetBrains)" <valentin@jetbrains.com> wrote in
message news:cl2u2j$laq$1@is.intellij.net...

>
>> Probably not too far before the release because we are developing
>> .NET IDE
>>

at the same time and plan to have EAP for it before EAP for VS 2005
add-in.

>
>> BTW, we are also developing a .NET profiling tool and wish to open
>> EAP for
>>

it soon. Is anyone here interesting in such tool?

>
>> Valentin Kipiatkov
>> Chief Scientist, Vice President of Product Development
>> JetBrains, Inc
>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>> "Develop with pleasure!"
>>> And when is the EAP for version 2.0 expected?
>>>

>


0
Comment actions Permalink

It's a pity, because we want to start developing with VS2005 just now, so we'll miss ReSharper intelligence badly.
As for a profiling tool - I am very interested !

Thanks,
Jacob

Probably not too far before the release because we
are developing .NET IDE at the same time and plan to
have EAP for it before EAP for VS 2005 add-in.
BTW, we are also developing a .NET profiling tool and
wish to open EAP for it soon. Is anyone here
interesting in such tool?

Valentin Kipiatkov
Chief Scientist, Vice President of Product
Development
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

And when is the EAP for version 2.0 expected?


0
Comment actions Permalink

BTW, we are also developing a .NET profiling tool and
wish to open EAP for it soon. Is anyone here
interesting in such tool?


+2 over here!

-paul

0
Comment actions Permalink

Where do I sign up for the EAP?


We'll likely open it until the new year.

Valentin Kipiatkov
Chief Scientist, Vice President of Product Development
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

I actually had very good luck, but my profiling was centered around a
very specific area. I was able to see quickly where the problem was.
I never had to grab a manual to figure out how to use the application.
The opposite was true for Compuware's. I'm not the brightest bulb in
the Christmas tree, but I'm not too dim and Compuware just seem too
confusing. Granted it is very powerful.

Where do I sign up for the EAP?

Thanks,
Derek
"Valentin Kipiatkov (JetBrains)" <valentin@jetbrains.com> wrote in
message news:cl3116$di9$1@is.intellij.net...

>>> I am very interested! I hope you keep it simple like Red Gate's
>>> ANTS profiler and not overwhelming like Compuware's.
>>>
>> We try to make UI simple, intuitive and yet very powerful. :) BTW we
>> also tried ANTS profiler but the main concern with it was speed
>>

reduction of the program being profiled. In our tests (which are quite
CPU intensive and do not much IO interactions), speed reduction was
about 100 times. That was unacceptable because we often had to leave
the profiled program running over night to get it complete! With our
current profiler speed reduction on the same tests is 4-5 times or
even less.

>> Did you experience the same problems?
>>
>> Valentin Kipiatkov
>> Chief Scientist, Vice President of Product Development
>> JetBrains, Inc
>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>> "Develop with pleasure!"
>>> I am very interested! I hope you keep it simple like Red Gate's
>>> ANTS
>>> profiler and not overwhelming like Compuware's.
>>> Thanks,
>>> Derek Price
>>> "Valentin Kipiatkov (JetBrains)" <valentin@jetbrains.com> wrote in
>>> message news:cl2u2j$laq$1@is.intellij.net...
>>>> Probably not too far before the release because we are developing
>>>> .NET IDE
>>>>
>>> at the same time and plan to have EAP for it before EAP for VS 2005
>>> add-in.
>>>
>>>> BTW, we are also developing a .NET profiling tool and wish to open
>>>> EAP for
>>>>
>>> it soon. Is anyone here interesting in such tool?
>>>
>>>> Valentin Kipiatkov
>>>> Chief Scientist, Vice President of Product Development
>>>> JetBrains, Inc
>>>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>>>> "Develop with pleasure!"
>>>>> And when is the EAP for version 2.0 expected?
>>>>>

0
Comment actions Permalink

Just for your information, Red Gate has a version 2.0 coming out
mid-November:
www.red-gate.com/dotnet/profiler_roadmap.htm

Thanks,
Derek Price


0

Please sign in to leave a comment.