Exception throwing
I think, it will be great to make ability to turn off exceptions showing
so, if i report all founded bugs or exception and do not want to do it
again I turn off exceptions showing and my work may do faster and without
@#$@#$@##$@#$@#$ and etc.
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Hello Airex,
not sure what do you mean exactly but we intend to not show the exception
reporting form
if the previous exception has occurred just before the current. This should
make exception reporting
much less disturbing and also reduce the number of submitted redundant exceptions.
Regards,
Dmitry Shaporenkov
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:24:35 +0200, Dmitry Shaporenkov
<dsha@jetbrains.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> I think, it will be great to make ability to turn off exceptions
>> showing
>> so, if i report all founded bugs or exception and do not want to do it
>> again I turn off exceptions showing and my work may do faster and
>> withou t
>> @#$@#$@##$@#$@#$ and etc.
>>
>
>
I want to disable showing exceptions at all
--
ïÔÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÏ M2, ÒÅ×ÏÌÀÃÉÏÎÎÏÊ ÐÏÞÔÏ×ÏÊ ÐÒÏÇÒÁÍÍÏÊ Opera:
http://www.opera.com/mail/
The EAP program is intented to collect problems and exceptions from the
users.
We are not going to disable exception form in EAP.
--
Eugene Pasynkov
Developer
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"
"Airex" <airex.s@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:op.s1rok6jwyg18dx@w-skachkovsky.lana.vl.net.ua...
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:24:35 +0200, Dmitry Shaporenkov
<dsha@jetbrains.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> I think, it will be great to make ability to turn off exceptions
>> showing
>> so, if i report all founded bugs or exception and do not want to do it
>> again I turn off exceptions showing and my work may do faster and
>> withou t
>> @#$@#$@##$@#$@#$ and etc.
>>
>
>
I want to disable showing exceptions at all
--
ïÔÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÏ M2, ÒÅ×ÏÌÀÃÉÏÎÎÏÊ ÐÏÞÔÏ×ÏÊ ÐÒÏÇÒÁÍÍÏÊ Opera:
http://www.opera.com/mail/
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:30:33 +0200, Eugene Pasynkov (JetBrains)
<Eugene.Pasynkov@jetbrains.com> wrote:
>
too bad
because I have very big exceptions when use generics, and if a check
ignore exception next time, it throws again and again and window shows
every time...
So, one more
may be you must make exceptions history and store it localy.
it helps to do not show prevoius exceptions even if I close VS
--
ïÔÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÏ M2, ÒÅ×ÏÌÀÃÉÏÎÎÏÊ ÐÏÞÔÏ×ÏÊ ÐÒÏÇÒÁÍÍÏÊ Opera:
http://www.opera.com/mail/
This makes sense. If the stack's the same, why throw the exception again.
"Airex" <airex.s@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:op.s1rpqkpcyg18dx@w-skachkovsky.lana.vl.net.ua...
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:30:33 +0200, Eugene Pasynkov (JetBrains)
<Eugene.Pasynkov@jetbrains.com> wrote:
>
too bad
because I have very big exceptions when use generics, and if a check
ignore exception next time, it throws again and again and window shows
every time...
So, one more
may be you must make exceptions history and store it localy.
it helps to do not show prevoius exceptions even if I close VS
--
ïÔÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÏ M2, ÒÅ×ÏÌÀÃÉÏÎÎÏÊ ÐÏÞÔÏ×ÏÊ ÐÒÏÇÒÁÍÍÏÊ Opera:
http://www.opera.com/mail/
Hello Amir,
if the stack's the same, the exception is not shown - this has always been
the case.
But unfortunately this simple heuristics is not enough - in case of an exception
in a recursive call path, we'll get
a lot of exceptions with different but similar stack traces.
Regards,
Dmitry Shaporenkov
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"
>> The EAP program is intented to collect problems and exceptions from
>> the
>> users.
>> We are not going to disable exception form in EAP.
Across invocations?
"Dmitry Shaporenkov (JetBrains)" <dsha@jetbrains.com> wrote in message
news:c8a894d9cc1ba8c7cec75bd7abe0@news.intellij.net...
>
>
>> This makes sense. If the stack's the same, why throw the exception
>> again.
>>
>> "Airex" <airex.s@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:op.s1rpqkpcyg18dx@w-skachkovsky.lana.vl.net.ua...
>> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:30:33 +0200, Eugene Pasynkov (JetBrains)
>> <Eugene.Pasynkov@jetbrains.com> wrote:
>>> The EAP program is intented to collect problems and exceptions from
>>> the
>>> users.
>>> We are not going to disable exception form in EAP.
>> too bad
>> because I have very big exceptions when use generics, and if a check
>> ignore exception next time, it throws again and again and window shows
>> every time...
>> So, one more
>>
>> may be you must make exceptions history and store it localy. it helps
>> to do not show prevoius exceptions even if I close VS
>>
>
Hello Amir,
not sure what you mean, but similar exceptions differ only in a number of
repeating sequences of
stack frames:
...
Foo1!Bar1
Foo2!Bar2
...
and
...
Foo1!Bar1
Foo2!Bar2
Foo1!Bar1
Foo2!Bar2
...
Regards,
Dmitry Shaporenkov
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"
>> Hello Amir,
>>
>> if the stack's the same, the exception is not shown - this has always
>> been
>> the case. But unfortunately this simple heuristics is not enough - in
>> case
>> of an exception in a recursive call path, we'll get a lot of
>> exceptions
>> with different but similar stack traces.
>> Regards,
>> Dmitry Shaporenkov
>> JetBrains, Inc
>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>> "Develop with pleasure!"
>>> This makes sense. If the stack's the same, why throw the exception
>>> again.
>>>
>>> "Airex" <airex.s@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:op.s1rpqkpcyg18dx@w-skachkovsky.lana.vl.net.ua...
>>> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:30:33 +0200, Eugene Pasynkov (JetBrains)
>>> <Eugene.Pasynkov@jetbrains.com> wrote:
>>>> The EAP program is intented to collect problems and exceptions from
>>>> the
>>>> users.
>>>> We are not going to disable exception form in EAP.
>>> too bad
>>> because I have very big exceptions when use generics, and if a check
>>> ignore exception next time, it throws again and again and window
>>> shows
>>> every time...
>>> So, one more
>>> may be you must make exceptions history and store it localy. it
>>> helps to do not show prevoius exceptions even if I close VS
>>>
If I restart VS do I get a thrown exception again?
"Dmitry Shaporenkov (JetBrains)" <dsha@jetbrains.com> wrote in message
news:c8a894d9cc2088c7ced05861b3e5@news.intellij.net...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> Across invocations?
>>
>> "Dmitry Shaporenkov (JetBrains)" <dsha@jetbrains.com> wrote in message
>> news:c8a894d9cc1ba8c7cec75bd7abe0@news.intellij.net...
>>
>>> Hello Amir,
>>>
>>> if the stack's the same, the exception is not shown - this has always
>>> been
>>> the case. But unfortunately this simple heuristics is not enough - in
>>> case
>>> of an exception in a recursive call path, we'll get a lot of
>>> exceptions
>>> with different but similar stack traces.
>>> Regards,
>>> Dmitry Shaporenkov
>>> JetBrains, Inc
>>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>>> "Develop with pleasure!"
>>>> This makes sense. If the stack's the same, why throw the exception
>>>> again.
>>>>
>>>> "Airex" <airex.s@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:op.s1rpqkpcyg18dx@w-skachkovsky.lana.vl.net.ua...
>>>> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:30:33 +0200, Eugene Pasynkov (JetBrains)
>>>> <Eugene.Pasynkov@jetbrains.com> wrote:
>>>>> The EAP program is intented to collect problems and exceptions from
>>>>> the
>>>>> users.
>>>>> We are not going to disable exception form in EAP.
>>>> too bad
>>>> because I have very big exceptions when use generics, and if a check
>>>> ignore exception next time, it throws again and again and window
>>>> shows
>>>> every time...
>>>> So, one more
>>>> may be you must make exceptions history and store it localy. it
>>>> helps to do not show prevoius exceptions even if I close VS
>>>>
>
>
Hello Amir,
yes, ReSharper doesn't persist information about exception across VS sessions.
Regards,
Dmitry Shaporenkov
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"
>> Hello Amir,
>>
>> not sure what you mean, but similar exceptions differ only in a
>> number of
>> repeating sequences of
>> stack frames:
>> ...
>> Foo1!Bar1
>> Foo2!Bar2
>> ...
>> and
>> ...
>> Foo1!Bar1
>> Foo2!Bar2
>> Foo1!Bar1
>> Foo2!Bar2
>> ...
>> Regards,
>> Dmitry Shaporenkov
>> JetBrains, Inc
>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>> "Develop with pleasure!"
>>> Across invocations?
>>>
>>> "Dmitry Shaporenkov (JetBrains)" <dsha@jetbrains.com> wrote in
>>> message news:c8a894d9cc1ba8c7cec75bd7abe0@news.intellij.net...
>>>
>>>> Hello Amir,
>>>>
>>>> if the stack's the same, the exception is not shown - this has
>>>> always
>>>> been
>>>> the case. But unfortunately this simple heuristics is not enough -
>>>> in
>>>> case
>>>> of an exception in a recursive call path, we'll get a lot of
>>>> exceptions
>>>> with different but similar stack traces.
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Dmitry Shaporenkov
>>>> JetBrains, Inc
>>>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>>>> "Develop with pleasure!"
>>>>> This makes sense. If the stack's the same, why throw the exception
>>>>> again.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Airex" <airex.s@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:op.s1rpqkpcyg18dx@w-skachkovsky.lana.vl.net.ua...
>>>>> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:30:33 +0200, Eugene Pasynkov (JetBrains)
>>>>> <Eugene.Pasynkov@jetbrains.com> wrote:
>>>>>> The EAP program is intented to collect problems and exceptions
>>>>>> from
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> users.
>>>>>> We are not going to disable exception form in EAP.
>>>>> too bad
>>>>> because I have very big exceptions when use generics, and if a
>>>>> check
>>>>> ignore exception next time, it throws again and again and window
>>>>> shows
>>>>> every time...
>>>>> So, one more
>>>>> may be you must make exceptions history and store it localy. it
>>>>> helps to do not show prevoius exceptions even if I close VS
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:14:45 +0200, Dmitry Shaporenkov
<dsha@jetbrains.com> wrote:
>
>
>
But, it must do it for perfomancea and conveniance
--
ïÔÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÏ M2, ÒÅ×ÏÌÀÃÉÏÎÎÏÊ ÐÏÞÔÏ×ÏÊ ÐÒÏÇÒÁÍÍÏÊ Opera:
http://www.opera.com/mail/
Hello Airex,
I'd rather say it shouldn't throw unhandled exceptions - all such situations
are bugs, after all.
I doubt it makes much sense in injecting a full-fledged exception management
system into ReSharper,
we'll better spend our time on fixing problems that cause those exceptions.
Regards,
Dmitry Shaporenkov
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"
>> Hello Amir,
>>
>> yes, ReSharper doesn't persist information about exception across VS
>> sessions.
>>