Exception throwing

I think, it will be great to make ability to turn off exceptions showing
so, if i report all founded bugs or exception and do not want to do it
again I turn off exceptions showing and my work may do faster and without
@#$@#$@##$@#$@#$ and etc.

12 comments
Comment actions Permalink

Hello Airex,

not sure what do you mean exactly but we intend to not show the exception
reporting form
if the previous exception has occurred just before the current. This should
make exception reporting
much less disturbing and also reduce the number of submitted redundant exceptions.


Regards,
Dmitry Shaporenkov
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

I think, it will be great to make ability to turn off exceptions
showing

so, if i report all founded bugs or exception and do not want to do it

again I turn off exceptions showing and my work may do faster and
withou t

@#$@#$@##$@#$@#$ and etc.



0
Comment actions Permalink

On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:24:35 +0200, Dmitry Shaporenkov
<dsha@jetbrains.com> wrote:

Hello Airex,

>

not sure what do you mean exactly but we intend to not show the
exception reporting form
if the previous exception has occurred just before the current. This
should make exception reporting much less disturbing and also reduce the
number of submitted redundant exceptions.

>
>

Regards,
Dmitry Shaporenkov
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

>
>> I think, it will be great to make ability to turn off exceptions
>> showing
>> so, if i report all founded bugs or exception and do not want to do it
>> again I turn off exceptions showing and my work may do faster and
>> withou t
>> @#$@#$@##$@#$@#$ and etc.
>>
>
>

I want to disable showing exceptions at all

--
ïÔÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÏ M2, ÒÅ×ÏÌÀÃÉÏÎÎÏÊ ÐÏÞÔÏ×ÏÊ ÐÒÏÇÒÁÍÍÏÊ Opera:
http://www.opera.com/mail/

0
Comment actions Permalink

The EAP program is intented to collect problems and exceptions from the
users.
We are not going to disable exception form in EAP.

--
Eugene Pasynkov
Developer
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"
"Airex" <airex.s@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:op.s1rok6jwyg18dx@w-skachkovsky.lana.vl.net.ua...
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:24:35 +0200, Dmitry Shaporenkov
<dsha@jetbrains.com> wrote:

Hello Airex,

>

not sure what do you mean exactly but we intend to not show the exception
reporting form
if the previous exception has occurred just before the current. This
should make exception reporting much less disturbing and also reduce the
number of submitted redundant exceptions.

>
>

Regards,
Dmitry Shaporenkov
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

>
>> I think, it will be great to make ability to turn off exceptions
>> showing
>> so, if i report all founded bugs or exception and do not want to do it
>> again I turn off exceptions showing and my work may do faster and
>> withou t
>> @#$@#$@##$@#$@#$ and etc.
>>
>
>

I want to disable showing exceptions at all

--
ïÔÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÏ M2, ÒÅ×ÏÌÀÃÉÏÎÎÏÊ ÐÏÞÔÏ×ÏÊ ÐÒÏÇÒÁÍÍÏÊ Opera:
http://www.opera.com/mail/


0
Comment actions Permalink

On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:30:33 +0200, Eugene Pasynkov (JetBrains)
<Eugene.Pasynkov@jetbrains.com> wrote:

The EAP program is intented to collect problems and exceptions from the
users.
We are not going to disable exception form in EAP.

>

too bad
because I have very big exceptions when use generics, and if a check
ignore exception next time, it throws again and again and window shows
every time...

So, one more

may be you must make exceptions history and store it localy.
it helps to do not show prevoius exceptions even if I close VS

--
ïÔÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÏ M2, ÒÅ×ÏÌÀÃÉÏÎÎÏÊ ÐÏÞÔÏ×ÏÊ ÐÒÏÇÒÁÍÍÏÊ Opera:
http://www.opera.com/mail/

0
Comment actions Permalink

This makes sense. If the stack's the same, why throw the exception again.

"Airex" <airex.s@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:op.s1rpqkpcyg18dx@w-skachkovsky.lana.vl.net.ua...
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:30:33 +0200, Eugene Pasynkov (JetBrains)
<Eugene.Pasynkov@jetbrains.com> wrote:

The EAP program is intented to collect problems and exceptions from the
users.
We are not going to disable exception form in EAP.

>

too bad
because I have very big exceptions when use generics, and if a check
ignore exception next time, it throws again and again and window shows
every time...

So, one more

may be you must make exceptions history and store it localy.
it helps to do not show prevoius exceptions even if I close VS

--
ïÔÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÏ M2, ÒÅ×ÏÌÀÃÉÏÎÎÏÊ ÐÏÞÔÏ×ÏÊ ÐÒÏÇÒÁÍÍÏÊ Opera:
http://www.opera.com/mail/


0
Comment actions Permalink

Hello Amir,

if the stack's the same, the exception is not shown - this has always been
the case.
But unfortunately this simple heuristics is not enough - in case of an exception
in a recursive call path, we'll get
a lot of exceptions with different but similar stack traces.

Regards,
Dmitry Shaporenkov
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

This makes sense. If the stack's the same, why throw the exception
again.

"Airex" <airex.s@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:op.s1rpqkpcyg18dx@w-skachkovsky.lana.vl.net.ua...
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:30:33 +0200, Eugene Pasynkov (JetBrains)
<Eugene.Pasynkov@jetbrains.com> wrote:

>> The EAP program is intented to collect problems and exceptions from
>> the
>> users.
>> We are not going to disable exception form in EAP.

too bad
because I have very big exceptions when use generics, and if a check
ignore exception next time, it throws again and again and window shows
every time...
So, one more

may be you must make exceptions history and store it localy. it helps
to do not show prevoius exceptions even if I close VS



0
Comment actions Permalink

Across invocations?

"Dmitry Shaporenkov (JetBrains)" <dsha@jetbrains.com> wrote in message
news:c8a894d9cc1ba8c7cec75bd7abe0@news.intellij.net...

Hello Amir,

>

if the stack's the same, the exception is not shown - this has always been
the case. But unfortunately this simple heuristics is not enough - in case
of an exception in a recursive call path, we'll get a lot of exceptions
with different but similar stack traces.
Regards,
Dmitry Shaporenkov
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

>
>> This makes sense. If the stack's the same, why throw the exception
>> again.
>>
>> "Airex" <airex.s@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:op.s1rpqkpcyg18dx@w-skachkovsky.lana.vl.net.ua...
>> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:30:33 +0200, Eugene Pasynkov (JetBrains)
>> <Eugene.Pasynkov@jetbrains.com> wrote:
>>> The EAP program is intented to collect problems and exceptions from
>>> the
>>> users.
>>> We are not going to disable exception form in EAP.
>> too bad
>> because I have very big exceptions when use generics, and if a check
>> ignore exception next time, it throws again and again and window shows
>> every time...
>> So, one more
>>
>> may be you must make exceptions history and store it localy. it helps
>> to do not show prevoius exceptions even if I close VS
>>
>



0
Comment actions Permalink

Hello Amir,

not sure what you mean, but similar exceptions differ only in a number of
repeating sequences of
stack frames:

...
Foo1!Bar1
Foo2!Bar2
...

and
...
Foo1!Bar1
Foo2!Bar2
Foo1!Bar1
Foo2!Bar2
...


Regards,
Dmitry Shaporenkov
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

Across invocations?

"Dmitry Shaporenkov (JetBrains)" <dsha@jetbrains.com> wrote in message
news:c8a894d9cc1ba8c7cec75bd7abe0@news.intellij.net...

>> Hello Amir,
>>
>> if the stack's the same, the exception is not shown - this has always
>> been
>> the case. But unfortunately this simple heuristics is not enough - in
>> case
>> of an exception in a recursive call path, we'll get a lot of
>> exceptions
>> with different but similar stack traces.
>> Regards,
>> Dmitry Shaporenkov
>> JetBrains, Inc
>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>> "Develop with pleasure!"
>>> This makes sense. If the stack's the same, why throw the exception
>>> again.
>>>
>>> "Airex" <airex.s@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:op.s1rpqkpcyg18dx@w-skachkovsky.lana.vl.net.ua...
>>> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:30:33 +0200, Eugene Pasynkov (JetBrains)
>>> <Eugene.Pasynkov@jetbrains.com> wrote:
>>>> The EAP program is intented to collect problems and exceptions from
>>>> the
>>>> users.
>>>> We are not going to disable exception form in EAP.
>>> too bad
>>> because I have very big exceptions when use generics, and if a check
>>> ignore exception next time, it throws again and again and window
>>> shows
>>> every time...
>>> So, one more
>>> may be you must make exceptions history and store it localy. it
>>> helps to do not show prevoius exceptions even if I close VS
>>>




0
Comment actions Permalink

If I restart VS do I get a thrown exception again?

"Dmitry Shaporenkov (JetBrains)" <dsha@jetbrains.com> wrote in message
news:c8a894d9cc2088c7ced05861b3e5@news.intellij.net...

Hello Amir,

>

not sure what you mean, but similar exceptions differ only in a number of
repeating sequences of
stack frames:

>

...
Foo1!Bar1
Foo2!Bar2
...

>

and
...
Foo1!Bar1
Foo2!Bar2
Foo1!Bar1
Foo2!Bar2
...

>
>

Regards,
Dmitry Shaporenkov
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

>
>> Across invocations?
>>
>> "Dmitry Shaporenkov (JetBrains)" <dsha@jetbrains.com> wrote in message
>> news:c8a894d9cc1ba8c7cec75bd7abe0@news.intellij.net...
>>
>>> Hello Amir,
>>>
>>> if the stack's the same, the exception is not shown - this has always
>>> been
>>> the case. But unfortunately this simple heuristics is not enough - in
>>> case
>>> of an exception in a recursive call path, we'll get a lot of
>>> exceptions
>>> with different but similar stack traces.
>>> Regards,
>>> Dmitry Shaporenkov
>>> JetBrains, Inc
>>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>>> "Develop with pleasure!"
>>>> This makes sense. If the stack's the same, why throw the exception
>>>> again.
>>>>
>>>> "Airex" <airex.s@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:op.s1rpqkpcyg18dx@w-skachkovsky.lana.vl.net.ua...
>>>> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:30:33 +0200, Eugene Pasynkov (JetBrains)
>>>> <Eugene.Pasynkov@jetbrains.com> wrote:
>>>>> The EAP program is intented to collect problems and exceptions from
>>>>> the
>>>>> users.
>>>>> We are not going to disable exception form in EAP.
>>>> too bad
>>>> because I have very big exceptions when use generics, and if a check
>>>> ignore exception next time, it throws again and again and window
>>>> shows
>>>> every time...
>>>> So, one more
>>>> may be you must make exceptions history and store it localy. it
>>>> helps to do not show prevoius exceptions even if I close VS
>>>>
>
>



0
Comment actions Permalink

Hello Amir,

yes, ReSharper doesn't persist information about exception across VS sessions.


Regards,
Dmitry Shaporenkov
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

If I restart VS do I get a thrown exception again?

"Dmitry Shaporenkov (JetBrains)" <dsha@jetbrains.com> wrote in message
news:c8a894d9cc2088c7ced05861b3e5@news.intellij.net...

>> Hello Amir,
>>
>> not sure what you mean, but similar exceptions differ only in a
>> number of
>> repeating sequences of
>> stack frames:
>> ...
>> Foo1!Bar1
>> Foo2!Bar2
>> ...
>> and
>> ...
>> Foo1!Bar1
>> Foo2!Bar2
>> Foo1!Bar1
>> Foo2!Bar2
>> ...
>> Regards,
>> Dmitry Shaporenkov
>> JetBrains, Inc
>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>> "Develop with pleasure!"
>>> Across invocations?
>>>
>>> "Dmitry Shaporenkov (JetBrains)" <dsha@jetbrains.com> wrote in
>>> message news:c8a894d9cc1ba8c7cec75bd7abe0@news.intellij.net...
>>>
>>>> Hello Amir,
>>>>
>>>> if the stack's the same, the exception is not shown - this has
>>>> always
>>>> been
>>>> the case. But unfortunately this simple heuristics is not enough -
>>>> in
>>>> case
>>>> of an exception in a recursive call path, we'll get a lot of
>>>> exceptions
>>>> with different but similar stack traces.
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Dmitry Shaporenkov
>>>> JetBrains, Inc
>>>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>>>> "Develop with pleasure!"
>>>>> This makes sense. If the stack's the same, why throw the exception
>>>>> again.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Airex" <airex.s@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:op.s1rpqkpcyg18dx@w-skachkovsky.lana.vl.net.ua...
>>>>> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:30:33 +0200, Eugene Pasynkov (JetBrains)
>>>>> <Eugene.Pasynkov@jetbrains.com> wrote:
>>>>>> The EAP program is intented to collect problems and exceptions
>>>>>> from
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> users.
>>>>>> We are not going to disable exception form in EAP.
>>>>> too bad
>>>>> because I have very big exceptions when use generics, and if a
>>>>> check
>>>>> ignore exception next time, it throws again and again and window
>>>>> shows
>>>>> every time...
>>>>> So, one more
>>>>> may be you must make exceptions history and store it localy. it
>>>>> helps to do not show prevoius exceptions even if I close VS


0
Comment actions Permalink

On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:14:45 +0200, Dmitry Shaporenkov
<dsha@jetbrains.com> wrote:

Hello Amir,

>

yes, ReSharper doesn't persist information about exception across VS
sessions.

>
>

But, it must do it for perfomancea and conveniance


--
ïÔÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÏ M2, ÒÅ×ÏÌÀÃÉÏÎÎÏÊ ÐÏÞÔÏ×ÏÊ ÐÒÏÇÒÁÍÍÏÊ Opera:
http://www.opera.com/mail/

0
Comment actions Permalink

Hello Airex,

I'd rather say it shouldn't throw unhandled exceptions - all such situations
are bugs, after all.
I doubt it makes much sense in injecting a full-fledged exception management
system into ReSharper,
we'll better spend our time on fixing problems that cause those exceptions.


Regards,
Dmitry Shaporenkov
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:14:45 +0200, Dmitry Shaporenkov
<dsha@jetbrains.com> wrote:

>> Hello Amir,
>>
>> yes, ReSharper doesn't persist information about exception across VS
>> sessions.
>>

But, it must do it for perfomancea and conveniance



0

Please sign in to leave a comment.