schemas-jetbrains-com:member-reordering-patterns

Created November 24, 2014 15:14

The XML schema for member reordering patterns has changed between version 8.2 and version 9 EAP. Could we get the updated XSD?

In the meantime, how would I convert this snippet to ReSharper 9?

<Sort> 
  <Access Order="public internal protected-internal protected private"/>  
 </Sort>

It appears that ReSharper 9 doesn't allow that kind of granularity. The designer will only let me do this instead.

 <Entry.SortBy>  
 <Access />  
 </Entry.SortBy>

4 comments

Steven Liekens

Created November 25, 2014 09:03

There appears to be a

<Access.Order />

collection property in XAML, but I don't know its item type.

What I've tried:

 <Entry.SortBy>

 <Access>

<Access.Order>

<AccessType>Public</AccessType> 
 <AccessType>Internal</AccessType> 
 <AccessType>ProtectedInternal</AccessType> 
 <AccessType>Protected</AccessType> 
 <AccessType>Private</AccessType>

</Access.Order>

</Access>

</Entry.SortBy>

This seems to almost work, but

<AccessType />

is not a valid element name.

Steven Liekens

Created November 25, 2014 09:38

My current type layout: https://gist.github.com/StevenLiekens/2ff74b148297c8879d3c

I'm still looking for a way to configure ordering type members by access type.

Alexander Kurakin

Created November 25, 2014 15:37

Hello Steven,

  Please try using one of the following ways:

<Entry.SortBy>
     <Access Order="Private Public" />
</Entry.SortBy>

  or

<Entry.SortBy>

   <Access>

       <Access.Order>
          <AccessModifier>Private</AccessModifier>
          <AccessModifier>Public</AccessModifier>
       </Access.Order>

   </Access>

</Entry.SortBy>

Thanks!

Steven Liekens

Created December 04, 2014 10:02

Thanks! Both ways work.

Next topic: what does the "Priority" attribute mean, when should I use it, and what happened to the "Weight" attribute?

Please sign in to leave a comment.