Eugene: Context actions: convert implicit interface method implementation to explicit and back

Hello Amir,

What needs explanation?
A context action was implemented in build 211 (not published in EAP yet).
It works as follows. Suppose you have an interface and its implemetation:
interface I { void Foo(); } class C : I { public void Foo() {} } While the caret is on 'Foo' you can convert the code to (and fro)

interface I
{
  void Foo();
}
class C : I
{
  void I.Foo() {}
}

http://www.intellij.net/tracker/resharper/viewSCR?publicId=12430

can you explain this?

Thanks,
Andrey Simanovsky

Thanks, that's the explanation I was looking for :) Maybe you can put it in
the tracker?
"Andrey Simanovsky (JetBrains)" <ands@intellij.com> wrote in message
news:c8a8a15de16f8c7c89cceed6195@news.intellij.net...

Hello Amir,

>

What needs explanation?
A context action was implemented in build 211 (not published in EAP yet).
It works as follows. Suppose you have an interface and its implemetation:
<pre>
interface I
{
void Foo();
}
class C : I
{
public void Foo() {}
}
</pre>

>

While the caret is on 'Foo' you can convert the code to (and fro)
<pre>
interface I
{
void Foo();
}
class C : I
{
void I.Foo() {}
}
</pre>
The action will be available through a quickfix-like UI.

>
>> http://www.intellij.net/tracker/resharper/viewSCR?publicId=12430
>>
>> can you explain this?
>>

Thanks,
Andrey Simanovsky

>

Never mind, I just put it in the tracker...

P.S., I directed this at Eugene because he was the one to close 11019...

"Amir Kolsky" <kolsky@actcom.net.il> wrote in message
news:dn467c$6su$1@is.intellij.net...

Thanks, that's the explanation I was looking for :) Maybe you can put it
in the tracker?
"Andrey Simanovsky (JetBrains)" <ands@intellij.com> wrote in message
news:c8a8a15de16f8c7c89cceed6195@news.intellij.net...

>> Hello Amir,
>>
>> What needs explanation?
>> A context action was implemented in build 211 (not published in EAP yet).
>> It works as follows. Suppose you have an interface and its implemetation:
>> >> interface I >> { >> void Foo(); >> } >> class C : I >> { >> public void Foo() {} >> } >> >> >> While the caret is on 'Foo' you can convert the code to (and fro) >>

>> interface I
>> {
>>  void Foo();
>> }
>> class C : I
>> {
>>  void I.Foo() {}
>> }
>> 

Arrrgh, 12430 not 11019... of course...

"Amir Kolsky" <kolsky@actcom.net.il> wrote in message
news:dn46da$dbl$1@is.intellij.net...

Never mind, I just put it in the tracker...

>

P.S., I directed this at Eugene because he was the one to close 11019...

>

"Amir Kolsky" <kolsky@actcom.net.il> wrote in message
news:dn467c$6su$1@is.intellij.net...

>> Thanks, that's the explanation I was looking for :) Maybe you can put it
>> in the tracker?
>> "Andrey Simanovsky (JetBrains)" wrote in message >> news:c8a8a15de16f8c7c89cceed6195@news.intellij.net... >>> Hello Amir, >>> >>> What needs explanation? >>> A context action was implemented in build 211 (not published in EAP >>> yet). It works as follows. Suppose you have an interface and its >>> implemetation: >>>

>>> interface I
>>> {
>>>  void Foo();
>>> }
>>> class C : I
>>> {
>>>  public void Foo() {}
>>> }
>>> 

>>> interface I
>>> {
>>>  void Foo();
>>> }
>>> class C : I
>>> {
>>>  void I.Foo() {}
>>> }
>>> 

Hello Amir,

I think tracker is not the place for documenting features.:)

Thanks, that's the explanation I was looking for :) Maybe you can put
it in
the tracker?

Thanks,
Andrey Simanovsky

Ah Ha!
But where do you send people to see what's new in the release?

To the tracker, filtered by release number....

What I do is go through the list looking for the new features or interesting
fixes. Now, others that won't understand what that feature is will
understand it there and then...

Amir


"Andrey Simanovsky (JetBrains)" <ands@intellij.com> wrote in message
news:c8a8a15de1758c7c8a2797fd500@news.intellij.net...

Hello Amir,

>

I think tracker is not the place for documenting features.:)

>
>> Thanks, that's the explanation I was looking for :) Maybe you can put
>> it in
>> the tracker?
>

Thanks,
Andrey Simanovsky

>