Matt Ellis

Created April 01, 2015 21:44

It would require a custom plugin, but could be quite a fun project. You can find out more about ReSharper plugins in the devguide.

1. Community
2. ReSharper Community
3. Caliburn micro support for resharper 9

• 0 votes

Created March 25, 2015 08:40

I think Microsoft is being a bit too prescriptive here. The point of these rules is so that you don't confuse a readonly field with a field that has readonly values. This is very valid advice, but ...

1. Community
2. ReSharper Community
3. Why does resharper suggests using readonly in fields that are not changed

• 0 votes

Created February 21, 2014 10:45

Try backslashes. I'm not sure if it requires them or not...

1. Community
2. ReSharper Community
3. ASP.NET MVC in a subfolder

• 0 votes

Created February 28, 2014 09:57

Logged! http://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/RSRP-406716

1. Community
2. ReSharper Community
3. ASP.NET MVC in a subfolder

• 0 votes

Created January 08, 2015 21:25

You can try enabling the log file. Start Visual Studio with the command "devenv /ReSharper.Internal". Go to Options -> Logging and click "Create File" for the Common logger. Then click "Edit File" ...

1. Community
2. ReSharper Community
3. "Method body is too complex to analyze, consider decomposing it"

• 0 votes

Created January 19, 2015 12:29

Hi, yes, thanks, I got the code, and it repros as expected. It turns out this is a change that was introduced in ReSharper 9.0, but it's actually not really a change in behaviour. The control flow ...

1. Community
2. ReSharper Community
3. "Method body is too complex to analyze, consider decomposing it"

• 0 votes

Created January 19, 2015 18:39

Well, I'm going be cagey :)One is legitimate behaviour. The second (e.g. equality operators being too complex) might be a bug, or it might have an interesting reason behind it, based on comparing s...

1. Community
2. ReSharper Community
3. "Method body is too complex to analyze, consider decomposing it"

• 0 votes

Created March 10, 2015 18:43

No, it *should* go away, because you're removing code from that method, so reducing the complexity.

1. Community
2. ReSharper Community
3. "Method body is too complex to analyze, consider decomposing it"

• 0 votes

Created August 04, 2015 10:22

Check that there are extension manager feeds enabled in the options. Go to ReSharper → Options → Extension Manager. There should be a feed that points to https://resharper.plugins.com, which ends i...

1. Community
2. ReSharper Community
3. Extensions Manager is empty on VS2015 Community

• 0 votes

Created August 04, 2015 14:16

OK, ReSharper seems to be making the request correctly. Any idea why it wouldn't return a response? Is that a proxy thing? (Although normally you'd see something like 407 if the proxy requires auth...

1. Community
2. ReSharper Community
3. Extensions Manager is empty on VS2015 Community

• 0 votes