Progress update

Hey y'all! Is it possible to get a progress update on the next version of ReSharper, and on the standalone IDE? I've very curious on the IDE especially. What features are planned for the first version, and how far along are you in the development?

9 comments
Comment actions Permalink

As for the plug-in release schedule we plan to have an intermediate release which will work with VS 2003 and feature a few more (probably about 5 more) refactorings comparing to 1.0 version. This release is planned for the beginning of the new year. Version which works under VS 2005 will be available approximately at the time of VS 2005 release.

We plan to switch our own developement to use of our own IDE in the end of the year - in the beginning of the next year. Soon after that we will have EAP for this IDE. It's difficult to talk about IDE features at the moment, what features would you like?

Also we are developing a profiling tool and will open it to EAP by the end of the year.

Valentin Kipiatkov
Chief Scientist, Vice President of Product Development
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

Hey y'all! Is it possible to get a progress update on the next version
of ReSharper, and on the standalone IDE? I've very curious on the IDE
especially. What features are planned for the first version, and how
far along are you in the development?


0
Comment actions Permalink

Please please please include "smart-enter" (from Intelli-J IDEA ... the
'complete statement' mapping) in the next Resharper!! Please :)


"Valentin Kipiatkov (JetBrains)" <valentin@jetbrains.com> wrote in message
news:cnkgbe$9dq$1@is.intellij.net...

As for the plug-in release schedule we plan to have an intermediate

release which will work with VS 2003 and feature a few more (probably about
5 more) refactorings comparing to 1.0 version. This release is planned for
the beginning of the new year. Version which works under VS 2005 will be
available approximately at the time of VS 2005 release.
>

We plan to switch our own developement to use of our own IDE in the end of

the year - in the beginning of the next year. Soon after that we will have
EAP for this IDE. It's difficult to talk about IDE features at the moment,
what features would you like?
>

Also we are developing a profiling tool and will open it to EAP by the end

of the year.
>

Valentin Kipiatkov
Chief Scientist, Vice President of Product Development
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

>

Hey y'all! Is it possible to get a progress update on the next version
of ReSharper, and on the standalone IDE? I've very curious on the IDE
especially. What features are planned for the first version, and how
far along are you in the development?

>

>


0
Comment actions Permalink

>Version which works under VS 2005 will be available approximately at the time of VS 2005 release.

When this version will be opened for EAP?

Thanks,
Jacob

0
Comment actions Permalink

When this version will be opened for EAP?


Probably not much before the release (1-2 months). Also we decided to have
an intermediate version (for VS 2003!) which will include more refactorings.

Valentin Kipiatkov
Chief Scientist, Vice President of Product Development
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

>> Version which works under VS 2005 will be available approximately at
>> the time of VS 2005 release.
>>

When this version will be opened for EAP?

Thanks,
Jacob



0
Comment actions Permalink

When do you plan to release the intermediate version for VS 2003?
Thanks,
Derek Price

"Valentin Kipiatkov (JetBrains)" <valentin@jetbrains.com> wrote in message
news:354038632370781836741614@news.intellij.net...

When this version will be opened for EAP?

>

Probably not much before the release (1-2 months). Also we decided to have
an intermediate version (for VS 2003!) which will include more

refactorings.
>

Valentin Kipiatkov
Chief Scientist, Vice President of Product Development
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"



0
Comment actions Permalink

Hello Derek,

When do you plan to release the intermediate version for VS 2003?
Thanks,
Derek Price
"Valentin Kipiatkov (JetBrains)" <valentin@jetbrains.com> wrote in
message news:354038632370781836741614@news.intellij.net...

>>> When this version will be opened for EAP?
>>>
>> Probably not much before the release (1-2 months). Also we decided to
>> have an intermediate version (for VS 2003!) which will include more
>>

refactorings.

>> Valentin Kipiatkov
>> Chief Scientist, Vice President of Product Development
>> JetBrains, Inc
>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>> "Develop with pleasure!"

I believe the VS .NET 2003 update (probably called ReSharper 1.5) will go
out the door in March-April, but nothing is official yet -- Valentin will
release more information on this if in fact that becomes final... I'd put
my money on March 2004 (if I were betting or doing insider trading ;-)...

Best,

David Stennett
JetBrains, Inc.


0
Comment actions Permalink

Hi David,

Do you know what features are planned? Just refactorings or any other
goodies? Will "ReSharper 1.5" have an EAP like version 1.0?

Thanks,
Derek

"David Stennett" <nospam@thankyou.com> wrote in message
news:57800632376830438753750@news.intellij.net...

I believe the VS .NET 2003 update (probably called ReSharper 1.5) will go
out the door in March-April, but nothing is official yet -- Valentin will
release more information on this if in fact that becomes final... I'd put
my money on March 2004 (if I were betting or doing insider trading ;-)...

>

Best,

>

David Stennett
JetBrains, Inc.



0
Comment actions Permalink

Two features I really, really want to see in an update to Reshaper:

1) The same "Smart-Enter" statement completion key-binding that is available
in IDEA

2) The ability to set some option so that Reshaper will understand that two
classes of exactly the same name are indeed the same, even if they're being
loaded from different assemblies (or more accurately, different copies of
the same assembly). This is a really big problem with our current solution,
which has tons of projects. We don't use "project references" for many
reasons... we use straight-forward DLL references. But this causes
Resharper to sometimes insist there are errors of the form "Cannot cast/pass
my.namespace.foo to my.namespace.foo" etc. It's very annoying, and very
unnecessary. The DLL assembly names are the same, the name space is the
same, the class name is the same... I want it to be treated identically.

3) Some mechanism for dealing with dll assembly references (as opposed to
project references). I don't know how much control you have over this, but
it'd be really nice to just be able to have a 'map' where I could map an
on-disk DLL in some \bin directory to the actual VS.Net project, so that
Resharper could find references and source code and the like.


"David Stennett" <nospam@thankyou.com> wrote in message
news:57800632376830438753750@news.intellij.net...

Hello Derek,

>

When do you plan to release the intermediate version for VS 2003?
Thanks,
Derek Price
"Valentin Kipiatkov (JetBrains)" <valentin@jetbrains.com> wrote in
message news:354038632370781836741614@news.intellij.net...

>
>>> When this version will be opened for EAP?
>>>
>> Probably not much before the release (1-2 months). Also we decided to
>> have an intermediate version (for VS 2003!) which will include more
>>

refactorings.

>
>> Valentin Kipiatkov
>> Chief Scientist, Vice President of Product Development
>> JetBrains, Inc
>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>> "Develop with pleasure!"

>

I believe the VS .NET 2003 update (probably called ReSharper 1.5) will go
out the door in March-April, but nothing is official yet -- Valentin will
release more information on this if in fact that becomes final... I'd put
my money on March 2004 (if I were betting or doing insider trading ;-)...

>

Best,

>

David Stennett
JetBrains, Inc.

>
>


0
Comment actions Permalink

Hi Paul,

>Two features I really, really want to see in an update to Reshaper:
>

<stripped/>

>
>2) The ability to set some option so that Reshaper will understand that
>two classes of exactly the same name are indeed the same, even if
>they're being loaded from different assemblies (or more accurately,
>different copies of the same assembly). This is a really big problem
>with our current solution, which has tons of projects. We don't use
>"project references" for many reasons... we use straight-forward DLL
>references. But this causes Resharper to sometimes insist there are
>errors of the form "Cannot cast/pass my.namespace.foo to
>my.namespace.foo" etc. It's very annoying, and very unnecessary. The
>DLL assembly names are the same, the name space is the same, the class name is the same... I want it to be treated identically.
>
>3) Some mechanism for dealing with dll assembly references (as opposed
>to project references). I don't know how much control you have over
>this, but it'd be really nice to just be able to have a 'map' where I
>could map an on-disk DLL in some \bin directory to the actual VS.Net
>project, so that Resharper could find references and source code and the like.
>

For 1.5 we plan to implement a feature that will allow to identify a reference
to a project and a reference to the project's output assembly. This will
fix the problems you mentioned.
Thank you for your interest & feedback!



0

Please sign in to leave a comment.