[233] New Members from Parameter


BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I've already posted this before but got no reply, so...

Given this code:

class Test
{
public Test(int param)
{
}
}

Before (don't remember the build), with the cursor inside param, a red
light bulb appeared kindly asking me to initialize a new member using
the param parameter, and generated this code:

class Test
{
int param;

public Test(int param)
{
this.param = param;
}
}

This is not working anymore, and I miss it! =)

Regards,
Pablo
-


BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFENuJrvooSiBfQCSoRApUtAJ9f2XaHFUpw+34nwGnVeTncW0m/WQCguapI
WP9fUFuZcXU+LvqgQ2iASwc=
=PZLI
-


END PGP SIGNATURE-----

5 comments
Comment actions Permalink

BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ummm...while I was working on other classes, the damned light buld
started appearing again.

Will try to reproduce when it doesn't work. Maybe is just my fault.

Sorry,
Pablo
-


BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFENuN/vooSiBfQCSoRAmb3AJ0WNa9cO646BwXcRucHAr5KPFM25wCdFuj5
ZYuXiZ/WE3IKfZalxJI5yr4=
=0vqa
-


END PGP SIGNATURE-----

0
Comment actions Permalink

Sometimes it is, sometimes it's not. Already noticed that in previous
builds. However, no that I try to, I can't reproduce it neither...



Pablo Montilla wrote:

---BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE---
Hash: SHA1

Ummm...while I was working on other classes, the damned light buld
started appearing again.

Will try to reproduce when it doesn't work. Maybe is just my fault.

Sorry,
Pablo
---BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE---
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFENuN/vooSiBfQCSoRAmb3AJ0WNa9cO646BwXcRucHAr5KPFM25wCdFuj5
ZYuXiZ/WE3IKfZalxJI5yr4=
=0vqa
---END PGP SIGNATURE---

0
Comment actions Permalink

Hello Philipp,

does it depend on the state of the collapsed / expanded regions in the file?
There was a problem that
the light bulb didn't appear if there were some collapsed regions, however,
that problem must have been
fixed by now.


Regards,
Dmitry Shaporenkov
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

Sometimes it is, sometimes it's not. Already noticed that in previous
builds. However, no that I try to, I can't reproduce it neither...

Pablo Montilla wrote:

>> -


BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> Ummm...while I was working on other classes, the damned light buld
>> started appearing again.
>>
>> Will try to reproduce when it doesn't work. Maybe is just my fault.
>>
>> Sorry,
>> Pablo
>> -


BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
>> iD8DBQFENuN/vooSiBfQCSoRAmb3AJ0WNa9cO646BwXcRucHAr5KPFM25wCdFuj5
>> ZYuXiZ/WE3IKfZalxJI5yr4=
>> =0vqa
>> -


END PGP SIGNATURE-----


0
Comment actions Permalink

Pablo,

I believe most such problems must be fixed in 233.
Please yell if it is not so ;)
BTW, do you have any collapsed regions in the file where this is
reproducible?

Friendly,
Dmitry

Pablo Montilla wrote:

---BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE---
Hash: SHA1

Ummm...while I was working on other classes, the damned light buld
started appearing again.

Will try to reproduce when it doesn't work. Maybe is just my fault.

Sorry,
Pablo
---BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE---
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFENuN/vooSiBfQCSoRAmb3AJ0WNa9cO646BwXcRucHAr5KPFM25wCdFuj5
ZYuXiZ/WE3IKfZalxJI5yr4=
=0vqa
---END PGP SIGNATURE---



--
Dmitry Lomov
Senior Software Developer
JetBrains Inc.
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop With Pleasure!"

0
Comment actions Permalink

BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dmitry Lomov (JetBrains) wrote:

Pablo,

I believe most such problems must be fixed in 233.
Please yell if it is not so ;)
BTW, do you have any collapsed regions in the file where this is
reproducible?

Friendly,
Dmitry


Nope. I couldn't reproduce it again. Will yell when I can! =)

Regards,
Pablo

-


BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFEOk0KvooSiBfQCSoRAjkUAKCVpehde8SorE61d05BQsiCMhaRnACgoxmm
sq1HTMuHp+U3sGv7roNk46c=
=98No
-


END PGP SIGNATURE-----

0

Please sign in to leave a comment.