Resharper code comment creates conflict with StyleCop

private void SomeFunc()
{
  do
  {
    // some code here
  }
  while(true);
}

R# marks that the function never returns, now I comment it so R# will ignore it.



private void SomeFunc()
{
  do
  {
    // some code here
  }
// ReSharper disable FunctionNeverReturns

while(true);

// ReSharper restore FunctionNeverReturns

}



 

But now I have a problem to comply with SA1515 (Singleline comments) or SA1108 (comment in bracketed statement).



0
3 comments

I noticed this too. When I disable a ReSharper message, I reformat the comments by myself. I think the varieties where the comments can be inserted are to much to make them fit SA-rules

By the way: I seldom use this disableing feature. I don't like the comments in my code. If there is a rule I generally don't like, I turn it off. In all other cases I make my code fit the ReSharper rules.

Regards
Susanne

0

I just think that there should be alternate ways to disable messages, like other comment types (//, /* */), pragmas, attributes, more flexible scoping, etc.,, that would allow disabling messages according to the situation.
Sometimes you just cant make the code fit the rules (in this case i just need an non-returning loop, no matter how I define it, R# will tell me that it IS non-returning). And disabling the rule generally is not advisable.

Liebe Grüße nach Deutschland.
Andreas

0
Avatar
Permanently deleted user

Hello,

I just think that there should be alternate ways to disable messages,
like other comment types (//, /* */), pragmas, attributes, more
flexible scoping, etc.,, that would allow disabling messages according
to the situation.


There're pragmas available, but R# wouldn't insert them by default anymore.

Standard C# warning pragmas could be used, like this:

#pragma warning disable FunctionNeverReturns


Serge Baltic
JetBrains, Inc — http://www.jetbrains.com
“Develop with pleasure!”


0

Please sign in to leave a comment.