3 comments
Comment actions Permalink

This is planned functionality for our TeamCity product ( http://www.jetbrains.com/teamcity/
). Expected to be implemented in TeamCity 2.0.

Valentin Kipiatkov
CTO and Chief Scientist
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

Would be nice if the Unit Testing was able to give coverage details -
i.e. indicating that the tests hit 15 of 18 methods and 12 of 14
properties in the class - indicating you have missed testing some
methods.



0
Comment actions Permalink

Will it also be available in Resharper? Being a team of one, TeamCity
doesn't have much advantage for me, and I don't really see how coverage in a
unit test is a team thing as opposed to a developer thing?

Dino

"Valentin Kipiatkov (JetBrains)" <valentin@jetbrains.com> wrote in message
news:46346ef1ebf6e8c8cd6643eb765a@news.intellij.net...

This is planned functionality for our TeamCity product (
http://www.jetbrains.com/teamcity/ ). Expected to be implemented in
TeamCity 2.0.

>

Valentin Kipiatkov
CTO and Chief Scientist
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

>
>> Would be nice if the Unit Testing was able to give coverage details -
>> i.e. indicating that the tests hit 15 of 18 methods and 12 of 14
>> properties in the class - indicating you have missed testing some
>> methods.
>>
>



0
Comment actions Permalink

Will it also be available in Resharper?


I think we'll have a separate addin to VisualStudio which does code coverage.
Of course, it will work well with ReSharper.

Being a team of one, TeamCity
doesn't have much advantage for me, and I don't really see how
coverage in a unit test is a team thing as opposed to a developer
thing?


Getting full code coverage is often a time-consuming process (tests for the
whole solution may take lot of time to be executed).
In TeamCity we have feature of running code coverage on the server. And when
you work in the IDE it fetches the last code coverage report from the server
and highlights the lines of the current file which were not covered by tests
(when the source file has not been changed dramatically, of course). You
see this information without additional efforts from your side and that's
very convenient. Currently, this functionality is implemented for Java only
but we work on implementing this for .NET/VisualStudio.

Valentin Kipiatkov
CTO and Chief Scientist
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

Will it also be available in Resharper? Being a team of one, TeamCity
doesn't have much advantage for me, and I don't really see how
coverage in a unit test is a team thing as opposed to a developer
thing?

Dino

"Valentin Kipiatkov (JetBrains)" <valentin@jetbrains.com> wrote in
message news:46346ef1ebf6e8c8cd6643eb765a@news.intellij.net...

>> This is planned functionality for our TeamCity product (
>> http://www.jetbrains.com/teamcity/ ). Expected to be implemented in
>> TeamCity 2.0.
>>
>> Valentin Kipiatkov
>> CTO and Chief Scientist
>> JetBrains, Inc
>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>> "Develop with pleasure!"
>>> Would be nice if the Unit Testing was able to give coverage details
>>> - i.e. indicating that the tests hit 15 of 18 methods and 12 of 14
>>> properties in the class - indicating you have missed testing some
>>> methods.
>>>


0

Please sign in to leave a comment.