VS 2008 editor hangs with Build 1170

i'm working on a Visual Basic project. After installing Build 1170 the Editor hangs very often. The UI dosen't respond anymore. There is no activity for Visual Studio in the process explorer. I can only kill the Visual Studio instance. I guess the problem is related to the Intellisense functionality because the hangup occurs just before the intellisense pops up. Very strange is, that i can't use my Firefox bookmarks while Visual Studio hangs.

As the hangup occurs every several minutes i deinstalled 1170 and returned to build 1168 which was quite stable for me.

Regards
Klaus

21 comments

same issue occurs on current build 1172. Visual Studio always hangs while opening Intellisene for Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel objects.

Regards
Klaus

0

Hi,

I'm having similar issues in VB VS2005 - frequently Visual Studio freezes and goes into not responding. 1164 was the last working version I tried, 1171/1172 both have this hanging issue. I haven't been able to find as predictable as a trigger as Klaus, but I am seeing it crash in <5 minutes of normal usage.

Since hanging VS tends to lead to losing source code, I've also reverted back to the 116x series pending a resolution of this issue.

Regards,

Geoff

0

same problem occurs with build 1173. I created a JIRA issue (http://www.jetbrains.net/jira/browse/RSRP-94779) for this.

Regards
Klaus

0

I believe I'm having a similar issue. I attached to devenv.exe with
another instance of Visual Studio to see if I could find out what was
hanging.

I'm not sure what's blocking VS (looks like it is Intellisense based on the
Main Thread stack trace later on), but here's a few stack traces of running
threads in VS. Hopefully that will help (and to the JetBrains staff, I'd be
happy to assist with diagnosing this problem more if you cannot reproduce
this issue).

Thread: LicenseCheck

System.dll!System.Net.Sockets.Socket.ReceiveFrom(byte[] buffer =
{byte[65536]}, int offset = 0, int size = 65536,
System.Net.Sockets.SocketFlags socketFlags, ref System.Net.EndPoint
remoteEP = {System.Net.IPEndPoint}) + 0x15d bytes

System.dll!System.Net.Sockets.UdpClient.Receive(ref System.Net.IPEndPoint
remoteEP = null) + 0x6e bytes
JetBrains.Platform.ReSharper.Shell.dll!JetBrains.Application.SocketManager.PortListenerThread.Run()
+ 0x94 bytes
mscorlib.dll!System.Threading.ThreadHelper.ThreadStart_Context(object
state) + 0x66 bytes
mscorlib.dll!System.Threading.ExecutionContext.Run(System.Threading.ExecutionContext
executionContext, System.Threading.ContextCallback callback, object state) +
0x6f bytes
mscorlib.dll!System.Threading.ThreadHelper.ThreadStart() + 0x44 bytes

And another one is blocked with this stack trace:

Thread: ]]>

System.dll!System.Net.Sockets.Socket.ReceiveFrom(byte[] buffer =
{byte[65536]}, int offset = 0, int size = 65536,
System.Net.Sockets.SocketFlags socketFlags, ref System.Net.EndPoint
remoteEP = {System.Net.IPEndPoint}) + 0x15d bytes

System.dll!System.Net.Sockets.UdpClient.Receive(ref System.Net.IPEndPoint
remoteEP = null) + 0x6e bytes
JetBrains.Platform.ReSharper.Shell.dll!JetBrains.Application.SocketManager.PortListenerThread.Run()
+ 0x94 bytes
mscorlib.dll!System.Threading.ThreadHelper.ThreadStart_Context(object
state) + 0x66 bytes
mscorlib.dll!System.Threading.ExecutionContext.Run(System.Threading.ExecutionContext
executionContext, System.Threading.ContextCallback callback, object state) +
0x6f bytes
mscorlib.dll!System.Threading.ThreadHelper.ThreadStart() + 0x44 bytes

Thread: Main Thread

JetBrains.Platform.ReSharper.Util.dll!JetBrains.Threading.ReentrancyGuard.NoReentrancySynchronizationContext.Wait(System.IntPtr[]
waitHandles, bool waitAll, int millisecondsTimeout) + 0x1e bytes

mscorlib.dll!System.Threading.SynchronizationContext.InvokeWaitMethodHelper(System.Threading.SynchronizationContext
syncContext, System.IntPtr[] waitHandles, bool waitAll, int
millisecondsTimeout) + 0x1a bytes


JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.dll!JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.ExtensionsAPI.Tree.CompositeElement.UpdateTreeTextCoords()
+ 0x53 bytes
JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.dll!JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.ExtensionsAPI.Tree.CompositeElement.GetTextLength()
+ 0x5 bytes
JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.dll!JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.ExtensionsAPI.Tree.CompositeElement.UpdateTreeTextCoords()
+ 0x8d bytes
JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.dll!JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.ExtensionsAPI.Tree.CompositeElement.GetTextLength()
+ 0x5 bytes
JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.dll!JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.ExtensionsAPI.Tree.CompositeElement.UpdateTreeTextCoords()
+ 0x8d bytes
JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.dll!JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.ExtensionsAPI.Tree.CompositeElement.GetTextLength()
+ 0x5 bytes
JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.dll!JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.ExtensionsAPI.Tree.CompositeElement.UpdateTreeTextCoords()
+ 0x8d bytes
JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.dll!JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.ExtensionsAPI.Tree.CompositeElement.GetTextLength()
+ 0x5 bytes
JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.dll!JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.ExtensionsAPI.Tree.CompositeElement.UpdateTreeTextCoords()
+ 0x8d bytes
JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.dll!JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.ExtensionsAPI.Tree.CompositeElement.GetTextLength()
+ 0x5 bytes
JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.dll!JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.ExtensionsAPI.Tree.CompositeElement.UpdateTreeTextCoords()
+ 0x8d bytes
JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.dll!JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.ExtensionsAPI.Tree.CompositeElement.GetTextLength()
+ 0x5 bytes
JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.dll!JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.ExtensionsAPI.Tree.CompositeElement.UpdateTreeTextCoords()
+ 0x8d bytes
JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.dll!JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.ExtensionsAPI.Tree.CompositeElement.GetTextLength()
+ 0x5 bytes
JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.dll!JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.ExtensionsAPI.Tree.CompositeElement.UpdateTreeTextCoords()
+ 0x8d bytes
JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.dll!JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.ExtensionsAPI.Tree.CompositeElement.GetTextLength()
+ 0x5 bytes
JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.VB.dll!JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.VB.Impl.Tree.ChameleonBlock.GetTextLength()
+ 0x34 bytes
JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.dll!JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.ExtensionsAPI.Tree.CompositeElement.FindElementAt(JetBrains.Util.TextRange
textRange) + 0x63 bytes
JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.dll!JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.ExtensionsAPI.Tree.CompositeElement.FindElementAt(JetBrains.Util.TextRange
textRange) + 0xac bytes
JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.dll!JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.ExtensionsAPI.Tree.CompositeElement.FindElementAt(JetBrains.Util.TextRange
textRange) + 0xac bytes
JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.dll!JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.ExtensionsAPI.Tree.CompositeElement.FindElementAt(JetBrains.Util.TextRange
textRange) + 0xac bytes
JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.dll!JetBrains.ReSharper.Psi.ExtensionsAPI.Tree.TreeElement.FindTokenAt(int
treeTextOffset = 1428) + 0x3b bytes
JetBrains.ReSharper.Feature.Services.VB.dll!JetBrains.ReSharper.Feature.Services.VB.MatchingBrace.VBMatchingBraceProvider.InvisibleBraceHintProvider.CheckValidity()
+ 0x60 bytes
JetBrains.ReSharper.Feature.Services.VB.dll!JetBrains.ReSharper.Feature.Services.VB.MatchingBrace.VBMatchingBraceProvider.InvisibleBraceHintProvider.GetText()
+ 0x17 bytes
JetBrains.ReSharper.Features.Intellisense.dll!JetBrains.ReSharper.Features.Intellisense.MatchingBrace.InvisibleBraceHint.ShowBraceHintOnTimer()
+ 0x5e bytes
JetBrains.ReSharper.Features.Intellisense.dll!JetBrains.ReSharper.Features.Intellisense.MatchingBrace.MatchingBraceHighlighting.JetBrains.ComponentModel.IComponent.Init.AnonymousMethod()
+ 0x3c bytes
JetBrains.Platform.ReSharper.Util.dll!JetBrains.DataFlow.Signal.Advise.AnonymousMethod() + 0xd bytes JetBrains.Platform.ReSharper.Util.dll!JetBrains.DataFlow.Signal.NotifySinks(bool payload = true) + 0x51 bytes JetBrains.Platform.ReSharper.Util.dll!JetBrains.DataFlow.Signal.Fire(bool value, object cookie) + 0x88 bytes JetBrains.Platform.ReSharper.Util.dll!JetBrains.Threading.GroupingEvent.Execute() + 0x5a bytes JetBrains.Platform.ReSharper.Util.dll!JetBrains.Threading.GroupingEventHost.ExecuteExpiredEvents() + 0x116 bytes JetBrains.Platform.ReSharper.Util.dll!JetBrains.Threading.GroupingEventHost.OnClockTimerTick.AnonymousMethod() + 0x9 bytes JetBrains.Platform.ReSharper.Util.dll!JetBrains.Threading.ReentrancyGuard.Execute(string name, System.Action action) + 0x81 bytes JetBrains.Platform.ReSharper.Util.dll!JetBrains.Threading.ReentrancyGuard.ExecuteOrQueue(string name, System.Action action) + 0x75 bytes JetBrains.Platform.ReSharper.Util.dll!JetBrains.Threading.GroupingEventHost.OnClockTimerTick() + 0x160 bytes JetBrains.Platform.ReSharper.Util.dll!JetBrains.Threading.GroupingEventHost.ClockTimer.OnTimerTick(object sender, System.EventArgs e) + 0x2f bytes System.Windows.Forms.dll!System.Windows.Forms.Timer.OnTick(System.EventArgs e) + 0x17 bytes System.Windows.Forms.dll!System.Windows.Forms.Timer.TimerNativeWindow.WndProc(ref System.Windows.Forms.Message m) + 0x34 bytes System.Windows.Forms.dll!System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.DebuggableCallback(System.IntPtr hWnd, int msg = 275, System.IntPtr wparam, System.IntPtr lparam) + 0x57 bytes "Klaus Luedenscheidt" ]]> wrote in message
news:415485.31121234254445794.JavaMail.clearspace@app4.labs.intellij.net...

same problem occurs with build 1173. I created a JIRA issue
(http://www.jetbrains.net/jira/browse/RSRP-94779) for this.

>

Regards
Klaus

>

---
Original message URL:
http://www.jetbrains.net/devnet/message/5231752#5231752


0

Klaus,

We've just caught and fixed a deadlock in R#, that occurred in VB projects.
Try the upcoming nightly build.
BTW, if it happens in the future, please attach a debugger (WindDbg for
instance) and capture all the stacktraces. Thanks in advance.

--
Sergey V. Coox
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"


0

Hello Sergey,

In WinDbg, to capture all managed stacktraces, issue the following command:
~* e !ClrStack

If !ClrStack command happens to be not available, load SOS (managed helper):
.loadby sos mscorwks


Sincerely,
Ilya Ryzhenkov

JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"


SC> Klaus,
SC>
SC> We've just caught and fixed a deadlock in R#, that occurred in VB
SC> projects.
SC> Try the upcoming nightly build.
SC> BTW, if it happens in the future, please attach a debugger (WindDbg
SC> for
SC> instance) and capture all the stacktraces. Thanks in advance.




0

I'm sorry for the offtopic question, but how did you get build 1170?

The last nightly build on the Confluence page is 1141(http://www.jetbrains.net/confluence/display/ReSharper/ReSharper+4.5+Nightly+Builds )

Am I missing something?

0

Awesome!

Just so we're using the right version, can you confirm which build the fix ended up in? With different timezones and build times, it's a bit ambiguous.

Thanks,

Geoff

0

Hi,

That seems to be the right page; and when I visit it I see all the nightly builds.

Sorry to ask the obvious, but:
1) Have you tried refreshing the page? Is it possible you're seeing a cached copy?
2) The most recent build is at the top, not the bottom as you might expect.

Geoff

0

GeoffHart wrote:

2) The most recent build is at the top, not the bottom as you might expect.


Gah... that was it.

Thanks

0

Hello Geoff,

You should try R# 4.5.1175.17 or greater

Awesome!

Just so we're using the right version, can you confirm which build the
fix ended up in? With different timezones and build times, it's a bit
ambiguous.

Thanks,

Geoff

---
Original message URL:
http://www.jetbrains.net/devnet/message/5231927#5231927



0

Hello Geoff,

You should try R# 4.5.1175.17 or greater

--
Kirill Falk
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

Awesome!

Just so we're using the right version, can you confirm which build the
fix ended up in? With different timezones and build times, it's a bit
ambiguous.

Thanks,

Geoff

---
Original message URL:
http://www.jetbrains.net/devnet/message/5231927#5231927



0

Hi Sergey,

Build 1175 rocks . There are no more hangups and the overall performance in VB is much better than in the previous builds.

I never worked with windbg. If you can tell me how to setup a windbg session i can attach a stacktrace when i run in trouble next time.

Regards
Klaus

0

Hello Klaus,

Btw, now you can rate the build, see download page:
http://www.jetbrains.net/confluence/display/ReSharper/ReSharper4.5Nightly+Builds

Sincerely,
Ilya Ryzhenkov

JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"


IR> Hi Sergey,
IR>
IR> Build 1175 rocks . There are no
IR> more hangups and the overall performance in VB is much better than
IR> in the previous builds.
IR>
IR> I never worked with windbg. If you can tell me how to setup a windbg
IR> session i can attach a stacktrace when i run in trouble next time.
IR>
IR> Regards
IR> Klaus
IR> ---
IR> Original message URL:
IR> http://www.jetbrains.net/devnet/message/5232048#5232048


0

Ilya Ryzhenkov wrote:

Hello Klaus,

Btw, now you can rate the build, see download page:
http://www.jetbrains.net/confluence/display/ReSharper/ReSharper4.5Ni
ghtly+Builds

Sincerely,
Ilya Ryzhenkov

JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"


IR> Hi Sergey,
IR> IR> Build 1175 rocks . There
are no IR> more hangups and the overall performance in VB is much
better than IR> in the previous builds.
IR> IR> I never worked with windbg. If you can tell me how to setup a
windbg IR> session i can attach a stacktrace when i run in trouble
next time. IR> IR> Regards
IR> Klaus
IR> ---
IR> Original message url:
IR> http://www.jetbrains.net/devnet/message/5232048#5232048


Thanks for this feature, this will be usefull for developers to know
which nigthly build is almost usable.

--
by Peter Sulek at 13. 2. 2009 9:26:01
XanaNews 1.18.1.6

0

Hello Peter,

Yeah, but someone will have to be first ;)

Sincerely,
Ilya Ryzhenkov

JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"


PS> Ilya Ryzhenkov wrote:
PS>
>> Hello Klaus,
>>
>> Btw, now you can rate the build, see download page:
>> http://www.jetbrains.net/confluence/display/ReSharper/ReSharper4.5N
>> i ghtly+Builds
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Ilya Ryzhenkov
>> JetBrains, Inc
>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>> "Develop with pleasure!"
>> IR> Hi Sergey,
>> IR> IR> Build 1175 rocks . There
>> are no IR> more hangups and the overall performance in VB is much
>> better than IR> in the previous builds.
>> IR> IR> I never worked with windbg. If you can tell me how to setup a
>> windbg IR> session i can attach a stacktrace when i run in trouble
>> next time. IR> IR> Regards
>> IR> Klaus
>> IR> ---
>> IR> Original message url:
>> IR> http://www.jetbrains.net/devnet/message/5232048#5232048
PS> Thanks for this feature, this will be usefull for developers to know
PS> which nigthly build is almost usable.
PS>


0

Ilya Ryzhenkov wrote:

Hello Peter,

Yeah, but someone will have to be first ;)

Sincerely,
Ilya Ryzhenkov

JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"


PS> Ilya Ryzhenkov wrote:
PS>

Hello Klaus,

Btw, now you can rate the build, see download page:
http://www.jetbrains.net/confluence/display/ReSharper/ReSharper+4.
5N i ghtlyBuilds

Sincerely,
Ilya Ryzhenkov
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

>>IR> Hi Sergey,
>>IR> IR> Build 1175 rocks .
There >>are no IR> more hangups and the overall performance in VB is
much >>better than IR> in the previous builds.
>>IR> IR> I never worked with windbg. If you can tell me how to setup
a >>windbg IR> session i can attach a stacktrace when i run in trouble
>>next time. IR> IR> Regards
>>IR> Klaus
>>IR> ---
>>IR> Original message url:
>>IR> http://www.jetbrains.net/devnet/message/5232048#5232048
PS> Thanks for this feature, this will be usefull for developers to
know PS> which nigthly build is almost usable.
PS>


Yes, i vote for 1175, it seams to me OK, also for MSBUILD scripts, no
hangs! more speed! superb!

--
by Peter Sulek at 13. 2. 2009 9:58:42
XanaNews 1.18.1.6

0

Hello Peter,

We've found that with SWA enabled, analysis behaves strange.

Sincerely,
Ilya Ryzhenkov

JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"


PS> Ilya Ryzhenkov wrote:
PS>
>> Hello Peter,
>>
>> Yeah, but someone will have to be first ;)
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Ilya Ryzhenkov
>> JetBrains, Inc
>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>> "Develop with pleasure!"
>> PS> Ilya Ryzhenkov wrote:
>> PS>
>>>> Hello Klaus,
>>>>
>>>> Btw, now you can rate the build, see download page:
>>>> http://www.jetbrains.net/confluence/display/ReSharper/ReSharper+4.
>>>> 5N i ghtlyBuilds
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>> Ilya Ryzhenkov
>>>> JetBrains, Inc
>>>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>>>> "Develop with pleasure!"
>>>> IR> Hi Sergey,
>>>> IR> IR> Build 1175 rocks .
>> There >>are no IR> more hangups and the overall performance in VB is
>> much >>better than IR> in the previous builds.
>>
>>>> IR> IR> I never worked with windbg. If you can tell me how to setup
>>>>
>> a >>windbg IR> session i can attach a stacktrace when i run in
>> trouble
>>
>>>> next time. IR> IR> Regards
>>>> IR> Klaus
>>>> IR> ---
>>>> IR> Original message url:
>>>> IR> http://www.jetbrains.net/devnet/message/5232048#5232048
>> PS> Thanks for this feature, this will be usefull for developers to
>> know PS> which nigthly build is almost usable.
>> PS>
PS> Yes, i vote for 1175, it seams to me OK, also for MSBUILD scripts,
PS> no hangs! more speed! superb!
PS>


0

Ilya Ryzhenkov wrote:

Hello Peter,

We've found that with SWA enabled, analysis behaves strange.

Sincerely,
Ilya Ryzhenkov

JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"


PS> Ilya Ryzhenkov wrote:
PS>

Hello Peter,

Yeah, but someone will have to be first ;)

Sincerely,
Ilya Ryzhenkov
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

>>PS> Ilya Ryzhenkov wrote:

PS>

Hello Klaus,

Btw, now you can rate the build, see download page:
http://www.jetbrains.net/confluence/display/ReSharper/ReSharpe
r4. 5N i ghtly+Builds

Sincerely,
Ilya Ryzhenkov
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

>>>>IR> Hi Sergey,
>>>>IR> IR> Build 1175 rocks .
>>There >>are no IR> more hangups and the overall performance in VB is
>>much >>better than IR> in the previous builds.

>>>>IR> IR> I never worked with windbg. If you can tell me how to
setup

>>a >>windbg IR> session i can attach a stacktrace when i run in

trouble

>>>>next time. IR> IR> Regards
>>>>IR> Klaus
>>>>IR> ---
>>>>IR> Original message url:
>>>>IR> http://www.jetbrains.net/devnet/message/5232048#5232048
>>PS> Thanks for this feature, this will be usefull for developers to
>>know PS> which nigthly build is almost usable.

PS>

PS> Yes, i vote for 1175, it seams to me OK, also for MSBUILD scripts,
PS> no hangs! more speed! superb!
PS>


What do you means SWA enabled?

--
by Peter Sulek at 13. 2. 2009 11:06:59
XanaNews 1.18.1.6

0

Hello Peter,

Solution Wide Analysis.

Sincerely,
Ilya Ryzhenkov

JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"


PS> Ilya Ryzhenkov wrote:
PS>
>> Hello Peter,
>>
>> We've found that with SWA enabled, analysis behaves strange.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Ilya Ryzhenkov
>> JetBrains, Inc
>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>> "Develop with pleasure!"
>> PS> Ilya Ryzhenkov wrote:
>> PS>
>>>> Hello Peter,
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, but someone will have to be first ;)
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>> Ilya Ryzhenkov
>>>> JetBrains, Inc
>>>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>>>> "Develop with pleasure!"
>>>> PS> Ilya Ryzhenkov wrote:
>>>> PS>
>>>>>> Hello Klaus,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Btw, now you can rate the build, see download page:
>>>>>> http://www.jetbrains.net/confluence/display/ReSharper/ReSharpe
>>>>>> r4. 5N i ghtly+Builds
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>> Ilya Ryzhenkov
>>>>>> JetBrains, Inc
>>>>>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>>>>>> "Develop with pleasure!"
>>>>>> IR> Hi Sergey,
>>>>>> IR> IR> Build 1175 rocks .
>>>> There >>are no IR> more hangups and the overall performance in VB
>>>> is much >>better than IR> in the previous builds.
>>>>
>>>>>> IR> IR> I never worked with windbg. If you can tell me how to
>>>>>>
>> setup
>>
>>>> a >>windbg IR> session i can attach a stacktrace when i run in
>>>> trouble
>>>>
>>>>>> next time. IR> IR> Regards
>>>>>> IR> Klaus
>>>>>> IR> ---
>>>>>> IR> Original message url:
>>>>>> IR> http://www.jetbrains.net/devnet/message/5232048#5232048
>>>> PS> Thanks for this feature, this will be usefull for developers to
>>>> know PS> which nigthly build is almost usable.
>>>> PS>
>> PS> Yes, i vote for 1175, it seams to me OK, also for MSBUILD
>> scripts,
>> PS> no hangs! more speed! superb!
>> PS>
PS> What do you means SWA enabled?
PS>


0

Ilya Ryzhenkov wrote:

Hello Peter,

Solution Wide Analysis.

Sincerely,
Ilya Ryzhenkov

JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"


PS> Ilya Ryzhenkov wrote:
PS>

Hello Peter,

We've found that with SWA enabled, analysis behaves strange.

Sincerely,
Ilya Ryzhenkov
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

>>PS> Ilya Ryzhenkov wrote:

PS>

Hello Peter,

Yeah, but someone will have to be first ;)

Sincerely,
Ilya Ryzhenkov
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

>>>>PS> Ilya Ryzhenkov wrote:

PS>

Hello Klaus,

Btw, now you can rate the build, see download page:
http://www.jetbrains.net/confluence/display/ReSharper/ReSh
arpe r4. 5N i ghtly+Builds

Sincerely,
Ilya Ryzhenkov
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

>>>>>>IR> Hi Sergey,
>>>>>>IR> IR> Build 1175 rocks .
>>>>There >>are no IR> more hangups and the overall performance in VB
>>>>is much >>better than IR> in the previous builds.

>>>>>>IR> IR> I never worked with windbg. If you can tell me how to

setup

>>>>a >>windbg IR> session i can attach a stacktrace when i run in

trouble

>>>>>>next time. IR> IR> Regards
>>>>>>IR> Klaus
>>>>>>IR> ---
>>>>>>IR> Original message url:
>>>>>>IR> http://www.jetbrains.net/devnet/message/5232048#5232048
>>>>PS> Thanks for this feature, this will be usefull for developers
to >>>>know PS> which nigthly build is almost usable.

PS>

>>PS> Yes, i vote for 1175, it seams to me OK, also for MSBUILD

scripts,

>>PS> no hangs! more speed! superb!

PS>

PS> What do you means SWA enabled?
PS>


AHA, i newer ever enables this feature.

--
by Peter Sulek at 13. 2. 2009 12:09:15
XanaNews 1.18.1.6

0

Please sign in to leave a comment.