FxCopy rules

(Sorry for posting so much today, usually I discover most things right after using a new tool)

Question: Is it possible/planned to allow FxCop rules to be used 1:1 inside ReSharper?

I really do love that IDE-integrated UI with the right colored bar to immediately point me to the correct source location. Much better solved than in FxCop.

Thanks
Uwe

3 comments
Comment actions Permalink

Hello Uwe,

Not in any near future. We did such research recently and found no way to
integrate FxCop rules with out code analysis system.
FxCop is based on compiled code, has own code model and API is more or less
sealed.

Sincerely,
Ilya Ryzhenkov

JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"


UK> +(Sorry for posting so much today, usually I discover most things
UK> right after using a new tool)+
UK>
UK> Question: Is it possible/planned to allow FxCop rules to be
UK> used 1:1 inside ReSharper?
UK>
UK> I really do love that IDE-integrated UI with the right colored bar
UK> to immediately point me to the correct source location. Much better
UK> solved than in FxCop.
UK>
UK> Thanks
UK> Uwe


0
Comment actions Permalink

True, but you could start incorporating more and more of the fxCop rules
into your code analysis, no? Optional ones, including naming conventions,
as well as critical ones like not returning arrays from property accessors,
etc.

"Ilya Ryzhenkov" <orangy@netix.ru> wrote in message
news:9f6b3e29136a168c944c85faa0d60@news.intellij.net...

Hello Uwe,

>

Not in any near future. We did such research recently and found no way to
integrate FxCop rules with out code analysis system. FxCop is based on
compiled code, has own code model and API is more or less sealed.

>

Sincerely,
Ilya Ryzhenkov

>

JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

>
>

UK> +(Sorry for posting so much today, usually I discover most things
UK> right after using a new tool)+
UK> UK> Question: Is it possible/planned to allow FxCop rules to be
UK> used 1:1 inside ReSharper?
UK> UK> I really do love that IDE-integrated UI with the right colored bar
UK> to immediately point me to the correct source location. Much better
UK> solved than in FxCop.
UK> UK> Thanks
UK> Uwe

>


0
Comment actions Permalink

Hello Paul,

True, but some of them can only be detected with global analysis. In the
next version we plan to do something in this area.
Also, many FxCop rules are really strange, somewhat idealistic :) We add
more and more analysis every version, if you miss something specific, please
create JIRA request. Thanks.

Sincerely,
Ilya Ryzhenkov

JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"


PB> True, but you could start incorporating more and more of the fxCop
PB> rules into your code analysis, no? Optional ones, including naming
PB> conventions, as well as critical ones like not returning arrays from
PB> property accessors, etc.
PB>
PB> "Ilya Ryzhenkov" <orangy@netix.ru> wrote in message
PB> news:9f6b3e29136a168c944c85faa0d60@news.intellij.net...
PB>
>> Hello Uwe,
>>
>> Not in any near future. We did such research recently and found no
>> way to integrate FxCop rules with out code analysis system. FxCop is
>> based on compiled code, has own code model and API is more or less
>> sealed.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Ilya Ryzhenkov
>> JetBrains, Inc
>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>> "Develop with pleasure!"
>> UK> +(Sorry for posting so much today, usually I discover most
>> things
>> UK> right after using a new tool)+
>> UK> UK> Question: Is it possible/planned to allow FxCop rules
>> to be
>> UK> used 1:1 inside ReSharper?
>> UK> UK> I really do love that IDE-integrated UI with the right
>> colored bar
>> UK> to immediately point me to the correct source location. Much
>> better
>> UK> solved than in FxCop.
>> UK> UK> Thanks
>> UK> Uwe


0

Please sign in to leave a comment.