Is it my imagination...

....or does every release of the EAP seem to be more unstable than the
previous one?

JM


11 comments
Comment actions Permalink

Not for me. 209 has been a significant improvement, especially running with
the release version of VS.

...or does every release of the EAP seem to be more unstable than the
previous one?

JM



0
Comment actions Permalink

This could simetimes appear.
This is because of a major changes are being made in the ReSharper core last
few weeks, and thus new bugs, new cases which are not covered by our Unit
tests, etc.

We are going to have the "feature-freeze" shortly, i.e. stop developing new
features, but completely focus on fixing bugs. So the overall stability
should have increased by the release

--
Eugene Pasynkov
Developer
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"


0
Comment actions Permalink

Thanks for the response. Don't get me wrong - - I love your product.


"Eugene Pasynkov (JetBrains)" <Eugene.Pasynkov@jetbrains.com> wrote in
message news:dl5d9q$qgu$1@is.intellij.net...

This could simetimes appear.
This is because of a major changes are being made in the ReSharper core
last few weeks, and thus new bugs, new cases which are not covered by our
Unit tests, etc.

>

We are going to have the "feature-freeze" shortly, i.e. stop developing
new features, but completely focus on fixing bugs. So the overall
stability should have increased by the release

>

--
Eugene Pasynkov
Developer
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

>



0
Comment actions Permalink

Thank you for asking the question. I wondered about the same thing.

"Jeff Michelson" <jmichelson@unitec-corp.com> wrote in message
news:dl4td6$31l$1@is.intellij.net...

...or does every release of the EAP seem to be more unstable than the
previous one?

>

JM



0
Comment actions Permalink

Hello Shimon,

it's difficult to find a reliable metric of quality of builds,
but for me personally 209 is much more stable than 208.

Regards,
Dmitry Shaporenkov
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

Thank you for asking the question. I wondered about the same thing.

"Jeff Michelson" <jmichelson@unitec-corp.com> wrote in message
news:dl4td6$31l$1@is.intellij.net...

>> ...or does every release of the EAP seem to be more unstable than the
>> previous one?
>>
>> JM
>>


0
Comment actions Permalink

I hope you manage to get the Smart-Enter/Statment-Completion in before you
freeze! And don't forget the ability to properly handle DLL project
references! :)


"Eugene Pasynkov (JetBrains)" <Eugene.Pasynkov@jetbrains.com> wrote in
message news:dl5d9q$qgu$1@is.intellij.net...

This could simetimes appear.
This is because of a major changes are being made in the ReSharper core
last few weeks, and thus new bugs, new cases which are not covered by our
Unit tests, etc.

>

We are going to have the "feature-freeze" shortly, i.e. stop developing
new features, but completely focus on fixing bugs. So the overall
stability should have increased by the release

>

--
Eugene Pasynkov
Developer
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

>



0
Comment actions Permalink

Is is possible to announce (in eap.announcements) when you have feature
freeze and what will and will not be included in 2.0?
Thank you,
Shimon.

"Dmitry Shaporenkov (JetBrains)" <dsha@jetbrains.com> wrote in message
news:c8a894d9aaae68c7b733ae5cd815@news.intellij.net...

Hello Shimon,

>

it's difficult to find a reliable metric of quality of builds,
but for me personally 209 is much more stable than 208.
Regards,
Dmitry Shaporenkov
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

>
>> Thank you for asking the question. I wondered about the same thing.
>>
>> "Jeff Michelson" <jmichelson@unitec-corp.com> wrote in message
>> news:dl4td6$31l$1@is.intellij.net...
>>
>>> ...or does every release of the EAP seem to be more unstable than the
>>> previous one?
>>>
>>> JM
>>>
>



0
Comment actions Permalink

I hope you manage to get the Smart-Enter/Statment-Completion in before
you freeze!


It's pity but I think we won't (expect it in 2.x).

And don't forget the ability to properly handle DLL
project references! :)


Of course.

Valentin Kipiatkov
Chief Scientist, Vice President of Product Development
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

I hope you manage to get the Smart-Enter/Statment-Completion in before
you freeze! And don't forget the ability to properly handle DLL
project references! :)

"Eugene Pasynkov (JetBrains)" <Eugene.Pasynkov@jetbrains.com> wrote in
message news:dl5d9q$qgu$1@is.intellij.net...

>> This could simetimes appear.
>> This is because of a major changes are being made in the ReSharper
>> core
>> last few weeks, and thus new bugs, new cases which are not covered by
>> our
>> Unit tests, etc.
>> We are going to have the "feature-freeze" shortly, i.e. stop
>> developing new features, but completely focus on fixing bugs. So the
>> overall stability should have increased by the release
>>
>> --
>> Eugene Pasynkov
>> Developer
>> JetBrains, Inc
>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>> "Develop with pleasure!"


0
Comment actions Permalink

I undrestand the need to get something solid out ASAP now that VS2005 is
released, but I have to admit disappointement because this was probably the
feature I was most looking forward to of all the new features :)

Ah well. Hopefully 2.x won't be too much of a delay beyond 2.0. And as it
turns out, our company isn't switching over to VS2005 until probably April
so there's some time...


"Valentin Kipiatkov (JetBrains)" <valentin@jetbrains.com> wrote in message
news:3fdb29a6969408c7b82783c58831@news.intellij.net...
>> I hope you manage to get the Smart-Enter/Statment-Completion in before
>> you freeze!
>

It's pity but I think we won't (expect it in 2.x).

>
>> And don't forget the ability to properly handle DLL
>> project references! :)
>

Of course.

>

Valentin Kipiatkov
Chief Scientist, Vice President of Product Development
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

>
>> I hope you manage to get the Smart-Enter/Statment-Completion in before
>> you freeze! And don't forget the ability to properly handle DLL
>> project references! :)
>>
>> "Eugene Pasynkov (JetBrains)" <Eugene.Pasynkov@jetbrains.com> wrote in
>> message news:dl5d9q$qgu$1@is.intellij.net...
>>
>>> This could simetimes appear.
>>> This is because of a major changes are being made in the ReSharper
>>> core
>>> last few weeks, and thus new bugs, new cases which are not covered by
>>> our
>>> Unit tests, etc.
>>> We are going to have the "feature-freeze" shortly, i.e. stop
>>> developing new features, but completely focus on fixing bugs. So the
>>> overall stability should have increased by the release
>>>
>>> --
>>> Eugene Pasynkov
>>> Developer
>>> JetBrains, Inc
>>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>>> "Develop with pleasure!"
>



0
Comment actions Permalink

Is is possible to announce (in eap.announcements) when you have
feature
freeze and what will and will not be included in 2.0?


The set of features listed at is planned:

http://www.jetbrains.net/confluence/display/ReSharper/ReSharper2.0Plan

However, it's not exact because we can drop a feature if it's not implemented
by the feature freeze. The current set is just our estimation.
Feature freeze is planned in a week but it depends on internal code refactorings
(mostly related to asynchronous startup) and can be shifted.

Valentin Kipiatkov
Chief Scientist, Vice President of Product Development
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

Is is possible to announce (in eap.announcements) when you have
feature
freeze and what will and will not be included in 2.0?
Thank you,
Shimon.
"Dmitry Shaporenkov (JetBrains)" <dsha@jetbrains.com> wrote in message
news:c8a894d9aaae68c7b733ae5cd815@news.intellij.net...

>> Hello Shimon,
>>
>> it's difficult to find a reliable metric of quality of builds,
>> but for me personally 209 is much more stable than 208.
>> Regards,
>> Dmitry Shaporenkov
>> JetBrains, Inc
>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>> "Develop with pleasure!"
>>> Thank you for asking the question. I wondered about the same thing.
>>>
>>> "Jeff Michelson" <jmichelson@unitec-corp.com> wrote in message
>>> news:dl4td6$31l$1@is.intellij.net...
>>>
>>>> ...or does every release of the EAP seem to be more unstable than
>>>> the previous one?
>>>>
>>>> JM
>>>>


0
Comment actions Permalink

Ah well. Hopefully 2.x won't be too much of a delay beyond 2.0. And


I think so. We do not plan massive internal redesign activities for 2.x and
probably the release will be about such features as this one, polishing of
existing one and plus VB.NET support. So we have good chances to make it
rather short release (and also open stable EAP for it soon).

Valentin Kipiatkov
Chief Scientist, Vice President of Product Development
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

I undrestand the need to get something solid out ASAP now that VS2005
is released, but I have to admit disappointement because this was
probably the feature I was most looking forward to of all the new
features :)

Ah well. Hopefully 2.x won't be too much of a delay beyond 2.0. And
as it turns out, our company isn't switching over to VS2005 until
probably April so there's some time...

"Valentin Kipiatkov (JetBrains)" <valentin@jetbrains.com> wrote in
message news:3fdb29a6969408c7b82783c58831@news.intellij.net...

>>> I hope you manage to get the Smart-Enter/Statment-Completion in
>>> before you freeze!
>>>
>> It's pity but I think we won't (expect it in 2.x).
>>
>>> And don't forget the ability to properly handle DLL project
>>> references! :)
>>>
>> Of course.
>>
>> Valentin Kipiatkov
>> Chief Scientist, Vice President of Product Development
>> JetBrains, Inc
>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>> "Develop with pleasure!"
>>> I hope you manage to get the Smart-Enter/Statment-Completion in
>>> before you freeze! And don't forget the ability to properly handle
>>> DLL project references! :)
>>>
>>> "Eugene Pasynkov (JetBrains)" <Eugene.Pasynkov@jetbrains.com> wrote
>>> in message news:dl5d9q$qgu$1@is.intellij.net...
>>>
>>>> This could simetimes appear.
>>>> This is because of a major changes are being made in the ReSharper
>>>> core
>>>> last few weeks, and thus new bugs, new cases which are not covered
>>>> by
>>>> our
>>>> Unit tests, etc.
>>>> We are going to have the "feature-freeze" shortly, i.e. stop
>>>> developing new features, but completely focus on fixing bugs. So
>>>> the
>>>> overall stability should have increased by the release
>>>> --
>>>> Eugene Pasynkov
>>>> Developer
>>>> JetBrains, Inc
>>>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>>>> "Develop with pleasure!"


0

Please sign in to leave a comment.