EAP 2.5 feedback?

Hey people,

We opened ReSharper 2.5 EAP a couple of days ago and there is no posts in
this forum with the feedback yet. We would appreciate your comments, thoughts,
etc

Valentin Kipiatkov
CTO and Chief Scientist
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"


7 comments
Comment actions Permalink

Hi Valentin,

I've been using 2.5 EAP since it is available. I think it is a good
improvement, both in terms of loading and parsing speed as well as UI. I
especially like the improved UI in the Find Reference window, though the code
preview pane in there seems to have caused some contextual menu issue in the
main VS2005 code editor. I haven't tried using the code preview pane since
yesterday so I can't say definitely whether it is reproducible or not.

Alex

Valentin Kipiatkov (JetBrains) wrote:

Hey people,

We opened ReSharper 2.5 EAP a couple of days ago and there is no posts
in this forum with the feedback yet. We would appreciate your comments,
thoughts, etc

Valentin Kipiatkov
CTO and Chief Scientist
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

0
Comment actions Permalink

Well ehhh, see RSRP-30890. I had to revert back to build 265.

Erwin

"Valentin Kipiatkov (JetBrains)" <valentin@jetbrains.com> schreef in bericht
news:46346ef1ebe778c8cbf663508870@news.intellij.net...

Hey people,

>

We opened ReSharper 2.5 EAP a couple of days ago and there is no posts in
this forum with the feedback yet. We would appreciate your comments,
thoughts, etc

>

Valentin Kipiatkov
CTO and Chief Scientist
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"

>



0
Comment actions Permalink

OK, Valentin. I download it and have it installed.

Good news so far: after tons of installation problems in the past, build
300 installed flawlessly.

I'll start playing with it now.

-- Robert



Hey people,

We opened ReSharper 2.5 EAP a couple of days ago and there is no posts
in this forum with the feedback yet. We would appreciate your
comments, thoughts, etc

Valentin Kipiatkov
CTO and Chief Scientist
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"



0
Comment actions Permalink

Hello Valentin,

So far I am very impressed with build 300. It seems to be a little faster
than version 2.02, and I have only had one exception so far. I like the
UI improvements as they fit much better with the rest of Visual Studio.
Excellent work so far. I look forward to seeing even more improvements as
the EAP progresses!

~Andy

Hey people,

We opened ReSharper 2.5 EAP a couple of days ago and there is no posts
in this forum with the feedback yet. We would appreciate your
comments, thoughts, etc

Valentin Kipiatkov
CTO and Chief Scientist
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"



0
Comment actions Permalink

Valentin Kipiatkov (JetBrains) wrote:

We opened ReSharper 2.5 EAP a couple of days ago and there is no posts
in this forum with the feedback yet. We would appreciate your comments,
thoughts, etc


Hello Valentin,

the improvements over 2.0 are great! I like the UI improvements. The
"CamelHumps" are great!

The NULL checks are great too. First I thought I had to disable them.
But then I found the option to add a method signature that verifies an
object and now I'm happy that my "Expect.IsNotNull(bla)" is recognized
(see ReSharper | Options | Code inspection).

I had some exceptions on the first start of VS after install. Second
start was better. Now I get about some five exceptions a day or so.


Sincerely,
Stefan Lieser


--
Stefan Lieser
Web: http://www.lieser-online.de

0
Comment actions Permalink

Rename operation doesn't replace string literals as expected:

class Program
{
string test = "test";
}

1. Right-click, Refactor, Rename
2. Change "test" to "testing"
3. Ensure Search in comments and string literals is checked, and press
continue.
4. Usages in Comments and String literals popup is displayed
5. I check the line with string test = "test", and press Continue

The string isn't changed, I expected it to change the string to: string
testing = "testing";

Best wishes,

Dag Christensen


0
Comment actions Permalink

Hello Dag,

This bug is fixed in 301 build which will appear shortly.

Rename operation doesn't replace string literals as expected:

class Program
{
string test = "test";
}
1. Right-click, Refactor, Rename
2. Change "test" to "testing"
3. Ensure Search in comments and string literals is checked, and press
continue.
4. Usages in Comments and String literals popup is displayed
5. I check the line with string test = "test", and press Continue
The string isn't changed, I expected it to change the string to:
string testing = "testing";

Best wishes,

Dag Christensen

Best regards,
Andrey Simanovsky


0

Please sign in to leave a comment.