Does v3.0.2 support linq syntax and extension method?? I have tested it....it won't work.... moreover, it also don't know some keyword of c# 3.0, such as "var" .....
The 3.0.x builds only support C# 2.0, though you can install them for "Orcas". The C# 3.0 language support will be a major feature of 4.0 release. We hope to deliver first EAP bits of ReSharper 4.0 this Fall.
Oleg Stepanov Software Developer JetBrains, Inc http://www.jetbrains.com "Develop with pleasure!"
Dear Sir,
Does v3.0.2 support linq syntax and extension method?? I have tested it....it won't work.... moreover, it also don't know some keyword of c# 3.0, such as "var" .....
I know a whole lot of developers looking forward to the 3.0 language support. No pressure though....
/qb
Oleg Stepanov wrote:
Hello Jason,
The 3.0.x builds only support C# 2.0, though you can install them for "Orcas". The C# 3.0 language support will be a major feature of 4.0 release. We hope to deliver first EAP bits of ReSharper 4.0 this Fall.
Oleg Stepanov Software Developer JetBrains, Inc http://www.jetbrains.com "Develop with pleasure!"
>> Dear Sir, >> >> Does v3.0.2 support linq syntax and extension method?? >> I have tested it....it won't work.... >> moreover, it also don't know some keyword of c# 3.0, such as "var" >> .....
I am not using Resharper currently because I do so much work with lambdas and extension methods these days. I miss Resharper!
John Kordyback wrote:
I know a whole lot of developers looking forward to the 3.0 language support. No pressure though....
/qb
Oleg Stepanov wrote:
>> Hello Jason, >> >> The 3.0.x builds only support C# 2.0, though you can install them for >> "Orcas". The C# 3.0 language support will be a major feature of 4.0 >> release. We hope to deliver first EAP bits of ReSharper 4.0 this Fall. >> >> Oleg Stepanov >> Software Developer >> JetBrains, Inc >> http://www.jetbrains.com >> "Develop with pleasure!" >> >>> Dear Sir, >>> >>> Does v3.0.2 support linq syntax and extension method?? >>> I have tested it....it won't work.... >>> moreover, it also don't know some keyword of c# 3.0, such as "var" >>> ..... >> >>
It would be great if R# could leave VS2008 intact (use the original VS intellisense) for C# 3.0 projects but would still work for the older 2.0 projects...
Wiebe Tijsma
Justin Dunlap wrote:
I am not using Resharper currently because I do so much work with lambdas and extension methods these days. I miss Resharper!
John Kordyback wrote:
>> I know a whole lot of developers looking forward to the 3.0 language >> support. No pressure though.... >> >> /qb >> >> Oleg Stepanov wrote: >>> Hello Jason, >>> >>> The 3.0.x builds only support C# 2.0, though you can install them >>> for "Orcas". The C# 3.0 language support will be a major feature of >>> 4.0 release. We hope to deliver first EAP bits of ReSharper 4.0 this >>> Fall. >>> >>> Oleg Stepanov >>> Software Developer >>> JetBrains, Inc >>> http://www.jetbrains.com >>> "Develop with pleasure!" >>> >>>> Dear Sir, >>>> >>>> Does v3.0.2 support linq syntax and extension method?? >>>> I have tested it....it won't work.... >>>> moreover, it also don't know some keyword of c# 3.0, such as "var" >>>> ..... >>> >>>
It would be great if R# could leave VS2008 intact (use the original VS intellisense) for C# 3.0 projects but would still work for the older 2.0 projects...
They are no C# 3.0 Projects. Only Projects for specific framework versions.
You can write with C# 3.0 for the .NET 2.0 Framework. Yes, this is a supported feature. LINQ is currently not supported, but possible under 2.0 (SP1).
You can manually switch on the VS Intellisense in the R# Options Dialog.
>> It would be great if R# could leave VS2008 intact (use the original VS >> intellisense) for C# 3.0 projects but would still work for the older >> 2.0 projects...
They are no C# 3.0 Projects. Only Projects for specific framework versions.
You can write with C# 3.0 for the .NET 2.0 Framework. Yes, this is a supported feature. LINQ is currently not supported, but possible under 2.0 (SP1).
You can manually switch on the VS Intellisense in the R# Options Dialog.
Wow, that's like programming with mittens on. Personally I would commit murder without ReSharper - I just turn it off when I'm doing LINQ stuff.
Hang in there.
/qb
Justin Dunlap wrote:
I am not using Resharper currently because I do so much work with lambdas and extension methods these days. I miss Resharper!
John Kordyback wrote:
>> I know a whole lot of developers looking forward to the 3.0 language >> support. No pressure though.... >> >> /qb >> >> Oleg Stepanov wrote: >>> Hello Jason, >>> >>> The 3.0.x builds only support C# 2.0, though you can install them >>> for "Orcas". The C# 3.0 language support will be a major feature of >>> 4.0 release. We hope to deliver first EAP bits of ReSharper 4.0 this >>> Fall. >>> >>> Oleg Stepanov >>> Software Developer >>> JetBrains, Inc >>> http://www.jetbrains.com >>> "Develop with pleasure!" >>> >>>> Dear Sir, >>>> >>>> Does v3.0.2 support linq syntax and extension method?? >>>> I have tested it....it won't work.... >>>> moreover, it also don't know some keyword of c# 3.0, such as "var" >>>> ..... >>> >>>
Hello Jason,
The 3.0.x builds only support C# 2.0, though you can install them for "Orcas".
The C# 3.0 language support will be a major feature of 4.0 release. We hope
to deliver first EAP bits of ReSharper 4.0 this Fall.
Oleg Stepanov
Software Developer
JetBrains, Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"
I know a whole lot of developers looking forward to the 3.0 language
support. No pressure though....
/qb
Oleg Stepanov wrote:
>> Dear Sir,
>>
>> Does v3.0.2 support linq syntax and extension method??
>> I have tested it....it won't work....
>> moreover, it also don't know some keyword of c# 3.0, such as "var"
>> .....
I am not using Resharper currently because I do so much work with
lambdas and extension methods these days. I miss Resharper!
John Kordyback wrote:
>> Hello Jason,
>>
>> The 3.0.x builds only support C# 2.0, though you can install them for
>> "Orcas". The C# 3.0 language support will be a major feature of 4.0
>> release. We hope to deliver first EAP bits of ReSharper 4.0 this Fall.
>>
>> Oleg Stepanov
>> Software Developer
>> JetBrains, Inc
>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>> "Develop with pleasure!"
>>
>>> Dear Sir,
>>>
>>> Does v3.0.2 support linq syntax and extension method??
>>> I have tested it....it won't work....
>>> moreover, it also don't know some keyword of c# 3.0, such as "var"
>>> .....
>>
>>
It would be great if R# could leave VS2008 intact (use the original VS
intellisense) for C# 3.0 projects but would still work for the older 2.0
projects...
Wiebe Tijsma
Justin Dunlap wrote:
>> I know a whole lot of developers looking forward to the 3.0 language
>> support. No pressure though....
>>
>> /qb
>>
>> Oleg Stepanov wrote:
>>> Hello Jason,
>>>
>>> The 3.0.x builds only support C# 2.0, though you can install them
>>> for "Orcas". The C# 3.0 language support will be a major feature of
>>> 4.0 release. We hope to deliver first EAP bits of ReSharper 4.0 this
>>> Fall.
>>>
>>> Oleg Stepanov
>>> Software Developer
>>> JetBrains, Inc
>>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>>> "Develop with pleasure!"
>>>
>>>> Dear Sir,
>>>>
>>>> Does v3.0.2 support linq syntax and extension method??
>>>> I have tested it....it won't work....
>>>> moreover, it also don't know some keyword of c# 3.0, such as "var"
>>>> .....
>>>
>>>
"Wiebe Tijsma" <wiebeREMOVE@CAPITALStijsma.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:fbp146$kce$1@is.intellij.net...
They are no C# 3.0 Projects. Only Projects for specific framework versions.
You can write with C# 3.0 for the .NET 2.0 Framework. Yes, this is a
supported feature. LINQ is currently not supported, but possible under 2.0
(SP1).
You can manually switch on the VS Intellisense in the R# Options Dialog.
--
Regards
Albert Weinert
MVP Visual Developer ASP.NET
http://der-albert.com
Oww? I didn't know that sorry, now that I look at it Intellisense does
allow C# 3.0 syntax in .NET 2.0 project. Weird.
But you probably do understand what I mean. Depending on which
framework/compiler you're targeting R# could be automatically disabled
or enabled.
To be honest, I didn't have the possibilities yet to work with Orcas
Beta 2 much.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Wiebe Tijsma.
Albert Weinert wrote:
>> It would be great if R# could leave VS2008 intact (use the original VS
>> intellisense) for C# 3.0 projects but would still work for the older
>> 2.0 projects...
"Wiebe Tijsma" <wiebeREMOVE@CAPITALStijsma.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:fbpae4$u5s$1@is.intellij.net...
Not wierd.
C# 3.0 is a Programming-Language, .NET 2.0 is a Framework. C#3.0 does not
need a new CLR (Common Language Runtime).
The C# 3.0 (and VB 9.0) features (extension Methods, anonymous objects etc.)
are only "syntactic sugar" ;), LINQ is again syntactic on top of that :)
--
Regards
Albert Weinert
MVP Visual Developer ASP.NET
http://der-albert.com
Wow, that's like programming with mittens on. Personally I would commit
murder without ReSharper - I just turn it off when I'm doing LINQ stuff.
Hang in there.
/qb
Justin Dunlap wrote:
>> I know a whole lot of developers looking forward to the 3.0 language
>> support. No pressure though....
>>
>> /qb
>>
>> Oleg Stepanov wrote:
>>> Hello Jason,
>>>
>>> The 3.0.x builds only support C# 2.0, though you can install them
>>> for "Orcas". The C# 3.0 language support will be a major feature of
>>> 4.0 release. We hope to deliver first EAP bits of ReSharper 4.0 this
>>> Fall.
>>>
>>> Oleg Stepanov
>>> Software Developer
>>> JetBrains, Inc
>>> http://www.jetbrains.com
>>> "Develop with pleasure!"
>>>
>>>> Dear Sir,
>>>>
>>>> Does v3.0.2 support linq syntax and extension method??
>>>> I have tested it....it won't work....
>>>> moreover, it also don't know some keyword of c# 3.0, such as "var"
>>>> .....
>>>
>>>